Rechercher

PythonReactSEOPDF
OpenClaw

trust-decay-monitor

Helps track how AI skill verification results decay over time. A "verified" badge from 18 months ago may be meaningless today — dependencies updated, new attack vectors emerged, the ecosystem changed. Trust has a half-life.

andyxinweiminicloud0 installations selon la source☆ 0 Étoiles du dépôtv1.0.0

Installation

Suivez les instructions du dépôt pour votre agent. Consultez les fichiers et dépendances avant l’installation.

SkillHub CLI

skillhub install andyxinweiminicloud/trust-decay-monitor

Examinez la source et la compatibilité, puis suivez les étapes d’installation.

Donnez le lien à votre agent et demandez-lui d’examiner instructions et dépendances avant d’expliquer les étapes.

Voir la source ↗Guides

Instructions

That "Verified" Badge Is From 2024. Is the Skill Still Safe?

Helps track the freshness of skill verification results, flagging certifications that have decayed past their useful trust window.

Problem

A skill passes a security audit in March 2025. It gets a "verified" badge. Developers see the badge and trust it. Eighteen months later, the badge is still there — but:

  • The skill's 4 dependencies have had 47 combined updates since the audit
  • Two new CVEs affect the runtime version the skill targets
  • The skill's API endpoint now points to a domain that changed ownership
  • The marketplace added 3 new permission types that didn't exist during the original audit

The verification was real. The trust it implies is not. Security certifications have a half-life, and most agent marketplaces display them as if they're permanent.

This is trust decay: the gradual erosion of verification validity as the surrounding context changes. It's not that the audit was wrong — it's that the audit's conclusions no longer apply to the current reality.

What This Tracks

This monitor computes a trust freshness score for verified skills:

  1. Time since verification — Simple age of the last audit. Older = less trustworthy, with configurable decay curves
  2. Dependency churn — How many of the skill's dependencies have updated since the audit? Each update is a potential invalidation of audit assumptions
  3. Ecosystem context changes — New CVEs, new permission types, new attack patterns discovered since the audit date. The threat landscape the audit evaluated against may have shifted
  4. Domain and endpoint stability — Have any external URLs, API endpoints, or resource references in the skill changed destination since verification?
  5. Re-verification gap — How long since anyone (not just the original auditor) ran any form of security check on this skill?

How to Use

Input: Provide one of:

  • A skill slug or identifier with its...

Informations sur la source

Source
github
Repository
openclaw/skills
Path
skills/andyxinweiminicloud/trust-decay-monitor
Version
1.0.0
Commit
bafaa6ab45e0b40afe2ee52d8df0dd12f7f341d2
Source de classification
rules
Statut
active
Visibilité
public

Ces informations proviennent de l’analyse indexée et peuvent être anciennes. Vérifiez les fichiers actuels.

Contenu extrait

SKILL.md
# That "Verified" Badge Is From 2024. Is the Skill Still Safe?

> Helps track the freshness of skill verification results, flagging certifications that have decayed past their useful trust window.

## Problem

A skill passes a security audit in March 2025. It gets a "verified" badge. Developers see the badge and trust it. Eighteen months later, the badge is still there — but:

- The skill's 4 dependencies have had 47 combined updates since the audit
- Two new CVEs affect the runtime version the skill targets
- The skill's API endpoint now points to a domain that changed ownership
- The marketplace added 3 new permission types that didn't exist during the original audit

The verification was real. The trust it implies is not. Security certifications have a half-life, and most agent marketplaces display them as if they're permanent.

This is trust decay: the gradual erosion of verification validity as the surrounding context changes. It's not that the audit was wrong — it's that the audit's conclusions no longer apply to the current reality.

## What This Tracks

This monitor computes a trust freshness score for verified skills:

1. **Time since verification** — Simple age of the last audit. Older = less trustworthy, with configurable decay curves
2. **Dependency churn** — How many of the skill's dependencies have updated since the audit? Each update is a potential invalidation of audit assumptions
3. **Ecosystem context changes** — New CVEs, new permission types, new attack patterns discovered since the audit date. The threat landscape the audit evaluated against may have shifted
4. **Domain and endpoint stability** — Have any external URLs, API endpoints, or resource references in the skill changed destination since verification?
5. **Re-verification gap** — How long since anyone (not just the original auditor) ran any form of security check on this skill?

## How to Use

**Input**: Provide one of:
- A skill slug or identifier with its...

Skills associés

OpenClaw

1password

daggerkun007

Set up and use 1Password CLI (op). Use when installing the CLI, enabling desktop app integration, signing in (single or multi-account), or reading/injecting/running secrets via op.