git-workflow
Git workflow management with atomic commit principles. Capabilities: commit organization, branching strategies, merge/rebase workflows, PR management, history cleanup, staged change analysis, single-responsibil...
Skills correspondant au nom, à la description ou à l’auteur GitHub.
Git workflow management with atomic commit principles. Capabilities: commit organization, branching strategies, merge/rebase workflows, PR management, history cleanup, staged change analysis, single-responsibil...
Multi-agent code review for security, quality, and architecture. Use when user says "review", "review code", "check code", "code review", "review my changes", "review this", or wants feedback on their code.
Use when facing complex engineering challenges that require systematic methodology - horrible bugs, safe refactoring, code review, production incidents, technical debt decisions, or building confidence in unfam...
Manages GitLab merge requests. Use for creating, listing MRs across projects or groups. Triggers: PRs, code reviews.
Tech Lead role in AID methodology. Use for architecture decisions, code reviews, technical direction, operational readiness, team guidance.
AID Phase 4 - Development phase. Use for implementing features, TDD practices, code reviews, transitioning from planning to QA.
Developer role in AID methodology. Use for implementation, debugging, technical design, TDD workflow, code review.
Professional software QA and code review skill for ensuring code quality, comprehensive test coverage, standards compliance, and security through rigorous testing and validation workflows.
Crée une Pull Request en mode Continuous Delivery avec workflow complet : QA, labels version (major/minor/patch), feature flags, code review automatique.
Structured code review workflow for quality and consistency
Use when generating Chinese format Excel reports from GitHub code reviews with AI analysis and filtering by date, branch, or reviewers
Use when reviewing code for security, performance, or quality issues. Provides checklists and patterns for thorough code review.
Security analysis and threat modeling prompt templates for STRIDE analysis, code review, OWASP compliance, and vulnerability assessment. Use for security planning, pre-deployment reviews, and ongoing threat ass...
Multi-persona analytical framework for comprehensive code review and decision-making
Reviews pull requests and code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, PR review, or mentions reviewing changes.
Use when receiving code review feedback before implementing suggestions, especially if unclear or questionable.
Provides the complete code review scoring rubric with 10 weighted categories, severity multipliers, and deduction calculations. Use when performing quantified code reviews, calculating quality scores, or creati...
Confidence-based code review that filters issues to 80+ threshold, eliminating false positives and noise. Reviews implementation against plan or requirements for bugs, quality issues, and project conventions. U...
Copilot agent that assists with comprehensive code review focusing on code quality, SOLID principles, security, performance, and best practices Trigger terms: code review, review code, code quality, best pract...
Implements Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) for document and code review. Challenges assumptions, questions decisions, and suggests improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, documentation, or architectural decisio...
Autonomously implement tasks from specs, plans, or issues using subagents with TDD and code review
Comprehensive code review workflow coordinating quality, security, performance, and documentation reviewers. 4-hour timeline for thorough multi-agent review.
Guide for git operations with Claude Code. Commits, PRs, code review, branch management, and best practices. Use when committing changes, creating pull requests, reviewing code, or managing branches.
Comprehensive multi-agent code review with parallel analysis. Use for thorough code reviews, finding bugs, checking regressions, or getting alternative implementation perspectives.
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.