Skills correspondant au nom, à la description ou à l’auteur GitHub.
Follow consistent project structure, version control practices, environment configuration, code review processes, and development conventions across the entire application. Use this skill when organizing projec...
Automated code review with security scanning, quality metrics, and best practices analysis. Use when reviewing code for: (1) Security vulnerabilities and common attack vectors, (2) Code quality issues and maint...
Comprehensive code review workflow coordinating quality, security, performance, and documentation reviewers. 4-hour timeline for thorough multi-agent review.
Comprehensive code review using all available skills. Use before committing or when you want a thorough analysis of changes. Triggers on review code, check changes, full review, pre-commit review.
Creates pull requests with generated descriptions. Triggered when: PR creation, pull request, merge request, code review preparation.
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session. Dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks.
Deep code review with web research to verify against latest ecosystem. Use when user says 'double check against latest', 'verify versions', 'check security', 'review against docs', or needs deep analysis beyond...
Provides thorough code review guidance when users ask for code reviews, PR reviews, or feedback on their code. Activates when users mention reviewing code, checking for issues, or want feedback on implementatio...
Guide for creating comprehensive PR descriptions with proper structure, diagrams, and documentation for code reviews.
Request and process code reviews with proper context. Use after completing significant implementation work.
Git workflow and pull request specialist. Use when creating PRs, managing branches, establishing git conventions, or improving code review processes.
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREME...
Expert code review specialist for quality, security, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code changes, ensuring high development standards, or conducting security audits. Provides actionable feedback organi...
Performs thorough code reviews with focus on best practices, security, performance, and maintainability. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests, auditing code quality, or getting feedback on implementation...
Systematic code review workflow using zen mcp's codex tool. Use this skill when the user explicitly requests "use codex to check the code", "check if the recently generated code has any issues", or "check the c...
Comprehensive code review methodology with severity classification and confidence thresholds
Perform structured, actionable code reviews for Python code with clear findings and suggestions.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement...
Working effectively with others in coding projects – including code reviews, clear communication, and contributing to shared or open-source codebases.
Structured code review workflow for SRTD development. Use after implementing features, fixing bugs, or before merging to main. Ensures production-readiness through systematic review.
Comprehensive PR review with 6-7 parallel specialized agents. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking PRs, code review.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or st...
Use when completing tasks, code reviews, or deployments to verify work with evidence. Collects test results, build outputs, coverage metrics, and exit codes to prove work is complete.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement...
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.