Skills correspondant au nom, à la description ou à l’auteur GitHub.
Implement features via Codex MCP. Use when: writing new code from specs, implementing features, Codex-driven development. Not for: code review (use codex-code-review), architecture advice (use codex-architect)....
Use during verification phase when conducting thorough code reviews and providing constructive feedback based on universal software quality principles.
Use when integrating Ameba into development workflows including CI/CD pipelines, pre-commit hooks, GitHub Actions, and automated code review processes.
OpenAI Codex CLI orchestration for AI-assisted development using gpt-5.2-codex model. Capabilities: code generation, refactoring, automated editing, parallel task execution, session management, code review, arc...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "review PR", "code review", "audit code", "check for bugs", "security review", "review my changes", "find issues in this code", "review the diff",...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "use Codex", "ask Codex", "consult Codex", "Codex review", "use GPT for planning", "ask GPT to review", "get GPT's opinion", "what does GPT think", "second opinio...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "use Gemini", "ask Gemini", "consult Gemini", "Gemini review", "use Gemini for planning", "ask Gemini to review", "get Gemini's opinion", "what does Gemini think"...
Tactical code cleanup focusing on type strictness, single responsibility, fail-fast patterns, and DRY. Detects sloppy code, workarounds, silent failures, god classes, and duplication. Use for quick code quality...
Identify and fix common Next.js App Router anti-patterns and mistakes. Use when reviewing code for Next.js best practices, debugging performance issues, migrating from Pages Router patterns, or preventing commo...
Review a project's PRs to check for issues detected in code review by Seer Bug Prediction. Use when asked to review or fix issues identified by Sentry in PR comments, or to find recent PRs with Sentry feedback.
Expert code review for quality, security, and maintainability. Use after writing or modifying code, or when user asks for review.
Comprehensive security code audit using multi-phase analysis (Assessment → STRIDE Threat Modeling → Code Review → Report). Use when asked to perform security review, vulnerability assessment, code audit, pentes...
Systematic code review skill checking documentation quality and promoting code reuse
Automated AI-powered code review that runs on git hooks with progressive disclosure design. Use when setting up automated code review for a project, installing git hooks for code review, creating or modifying r...
Review AI-generated code changes before committing using GitHuman. Use when reviewing code changes, creating code reviews, checking what the AI agent wrote, preparing to commit, or when user mentions "review",...
Codebase comprehension via roam-code CLI. Use when exploring codebases, planning modifications, debugging failures, assessing PR risk, or checking architecture health. Triggers on: understanding project structu...
Review pull requests for code quality, security vulnerabilities, best practices, and potential issues. Use when reviewing PRs, examining diffs, or providing code review feedback.
CRITICAL: Use for unsafe Rust code review and FFI. Triggers on: unsafe, raw pointer, FFI, extern, transmute, *mut, *const, union, #[repr(C)], libc, std::ffi, MaybeUninit, NonNull, SAFETY comment, soundness, und...
Centralizes persona-driven code reviews (Fowler, Torvalds, Carmack, React core, etc.) so Claude can pick or combine expert viewpoints when the user asks for a code review or perspective-specific critique.
This skill should be used when users request code review, refactoring, or code quality improvements for Ruby codebases. Apply Sandi Metz's four rules for writing maintainable object-oriented code - classes unde...
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or st...
Use when completing tasks, code reviews, or deployments to verify work with evidence. Collects test results, build outputs, coverage metrics, and exit codes to prove work is complete.
Comprehensive PR review with 6-7 parallel specialized agents. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking PRs, code review.
Provides comprehensive code review covering 6 focused aspects - architecture & design, code quality, security & dependencies, performance & scalability, testing coverage, and documentation & API design. Use thi...
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.