Skills correspondant au nom, à la description ou à l’auteur GitHub.
Discovers existing React component patterns (file structure, state management, naming conventions, prop patterns, TypeScript conventions) in a codebase before writing new components. Produces a "use these patte...
Expert at TypeScript strict mode, linting, formatting, code review standards. Use when checking code quality, fixing type errors, or enforcing standards.
Token-efficient codebase exploration using RepoPrompt codemaps and slices. Use when you need deep codebase understanding without bloating context, finding all pieces of a feature across many files, or building...
Use the lumen CLI for git diffs, AI-generated commit messages, change explanations, and git command generation. Triggers on diff viewing, commit drafting, code review, explaining git changes, or generating git...
Use when (1) Creating/modifying Wagtail Page/Snippet models, (2) Configuring Headless API - CRITICAL for RichText/ImageChooserBlock serialization bugs, (3) Implementing StreamField with 3+ block types, (4) Sett...
Creates new Claude Code agent (subagent) definitions. Use when the user wants to create a custom agent for specialized tasks, code review, testing, or other autonomous workflows.
Comprehensive Rust development expertise covering core principles, patterns, error handling, async programming, testing, and performance optimization. Use when working on Rust projects requiring guidance on: (1...
Guide for creating comprehensive PR descriptions with proper structure, diagrams, and documentation for code reviews.
Comprehensive code review using all available skills. Use before committing or when you want a thorough analysis of changes. Triggers on review code, check changes, full review, pre-commit review.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement...
Code review a GitHub pull request
Creates pull requests with generated descriptions. Triggered when: PR creation, pull request, merge request, code review preparation.
Addresses PR review comments systematically. Use when fixing review feedback, responding to code review threads, or processing PR comments.
TDD実装 + 品質自動化スキル Red-Green-Refactor サイクルでTDD実装を行います。 事前品質監査（OSS License, Version Audit）、自動修正ループ（最大5回）、 事後品質レビュー（Code Review, Design Review）を含みます。 カ...
Provides thorough code review guidance when users ask for code reviews, PR reviews, or feedback on their code. Activates when users mention reviewing code, checking for issues, or want feedback on implementatio...
Senior frontend code review for Vue/TypeScript. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or validating against project conventions.
Systematic code review following BUGBOT patterns and quality standards
Complete code review workflow for both requesting and receiving reviews. Use when creating PRs, reviewing code, or responding to feedback.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "review this PR", "code review", "audit this code", or mentions reviewing pull requests, security checks, or code quality. Covers security (OWASP),...
Use when receiving code review feedback to enforce engineering rigor. Ensures feedback is verified, understood, and technically evaluated before implementation, preventing performative agreement and blind chang...
Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.
Systematic multi-perspective code review with consistent quality gates.
Perform thorough code reviews focusing on security, performance, best practices, and maintainability. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code quality, or auditing existing code.
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.