name: pr-code-review description: Review GitHub PRs for bugs and code quality. Use when user says "review PR", "check PR #123", or mentions PR review.

PR Code Review

Straightforward code review for GitHub pull requests. Reviews the diff directly, only spawns agents when you need deeper codebase context.

Triggers

• "review PR #123"
• "check this PR"
• "code review"

How it works

You review the PR yourself using gh CLI. Only use explore agent if you need to understand unfamiliar parts of the codebase.

Review process

1. Check if PR is reviewable

gh pr view {number} --json state,isDraft,title,body

Skip if closed, draft, or already has your review:

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{number}/comments | grep -c "Claude Code"

2. Get the diff and context

gh pr view {number}
gh pr diff {number}

Read CLAUDE.md if it exists - it contains project coding standards.

3. Review the changes

Look at the diff yourself. Focus on:

Real bugs - logic errors, missing error handling, runtime issues, incorrect variable usage

CLAUDE.md violations - if the project has one, check for type hints, docstrings, line length (88), PEP 8 naming, uv-only (no pip)

Skip these - pre-existing issues (lines not in diff), linter-catchable stuff, style nitpicks not in CLAUDE.md

4. Use explore agent only when needed

If you're unfamiliar with how the codebase does something, spawn an explore agent:

Task(subagent_type="explore", prompt="Find how error handling is done in lmms_eval/models/ - what patterns exist?")

Don't spawn agents for every PR. Most diffs are self-contained.

5. Post your review

Get the commit SHA for links:

gh pr view {number} --json headRefOid --jq '.headRefOid'

Post with:

gh pr comment {number} --body "..."

Comment format

Write like a helpful colleague, not a robot. Keep it brief and actionable.

When you find issues:

### Code Review

Took a look at this PR. Found a couple things worth addressing:

**Missing return statement** in `ovo_doc_to_target` - the function computes the value but never returns it.
https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/blob/{SHA}/{file}#L102-L103

**No docstrings on public functions** - CLAUDE.md requires these for public APIs.
https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/blob/{SHA}/{file}#L17-L45

Otherwise looks good. Let me know if you have questions.

When it looks good:

### Code Review

Reviewed the changes - looks good to me. Clean implementation, follows existing patterns.

When skipping:

Just tell the user why: "PR #123 is a draft, skipping review."

What NOT to flag

• Issues on lines you didn't modify (pre-existing)
• Formatting/linting issues (CI catches these)
• Personal style preferences not in CLAUDE.md
• Lines with # noqa or similar ignore comments

Link format

Use full SHA, not short:

https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/blob/{FULL_SHA}/{file_path}#L{start}-L{end}

Multiple PRs

> Review all open PRs

Get the list and review each:

gh pr list --state open --json number