name: python-code-quality-scan description: Run analyzer MCP tools (Ruff + optional dead-code scan) as a quality gate before QA/UAT/release.

Skill Instructions

Purpose

Provide a consistent, repeatable code quality gate for Python changes.

This skill is intended to be invoked by agents with analyzer/* tooling enabled.

Inputs (Optional)

• TARGETS (string): paths to scan (default: src tests run.py run_tests.py)
• MODE (string): check (default) or fix (formats/fixes where safe)
• FAIL_ON_FINDINGS (string): true (default) or false

Procedure

0) Scope selection (recommended)

Prefer scanning only Python files that changed (fast, relevant). If that’s not feasible, scan the default TARGETS set.

1) Ruff lint (required)

For each target Python file:

• Read the file contents.
• Run analyzer/* Ruff lint on that code.

Acceptance target: no Ruff errors. If FAIL_ON_FINDINGS=true, treat warnings as failures too.

2) Ruff format (optional)

If MODE=fix:

• Run Ruff format via analyzer/* on the same file contents.
• Apply formatting updates to the file.
• Re-run Ruff lint to confirm it’s clean.

3) Dead-code scan (optional)

If available and appropriate:

• Run a dead-code scan (e.g., Vulture) on the same target code.
• Treat high-confidence findings as failures when FAIL_ON_FINDINGS=true.

Notes:

• Keep scope reasonable (changed files first) to avoid huge scans.
• If findings are intentionally accepted, document the rationale and any follow-up.

Output

Record:

• Which tools were run (ruff lint/format, dead-code scan)
• Targets scanned
• Pass/fail summary
• Any action taken (formatting, removal of unused imports, etc.)

Acceptance Criteria

• Ruff reports clean results for the chosen targets
• If dead-code scan is run: no high-confidence dead-code findings (or documented exceptions)