name: writing-plans description: Plan authoring skill with quality gates and AI estimation. Triggers on write-plan, implementation plan, design plan, feature plan, execution plan. Enforces zero-context clarity, TDD requirements, constitution compliance checklists, and agent hints for intelligent task routing.

Writing Plans

Purpose

Create implementation plans that zero-context agents can execute correctly. Plans must be explicit, complete, and verifiable without requiring the executing agent to have prior knowledge of the codebase.

When to Use

• User invokes /write-plan command
• Creating implementation strategies for features
• Breaking down complex features into tasks
• Planning migrations or refactoring work
• Designing multi-step integrations

Zero-Context Principle

Assume the executing agent:

• Has never seen this repository
• Has NOT read the engineering constitution
• Takes instructions literally without inference
• Needs exact file paths, not "appropriate directory"
• Needs complete commands with expected output
• Will not guess at missing information

Every task must be self-contained with all context needed to execute.

Plan Template Structure

Required Sections (7)

1. Executive Summary - Who, What, Why, Effort estimate (from AI consensus)
2. AI Estimation - Effort/Risk/Complexity from mcp__zen__consensus
3. Dependency Analysis - Task graph showing parallel groups
4. Task Breakdown - Per task: current code, test first (TDD), implementation, verification, constitution checklist
5. Execution Plan - Parallel groups, agent assignments with hints
6. Rollback Plan - Checkpoint strategy per group
7. Success Criteria - Verification commands with expected output

AI Estimation Integration

Use mcp__zen__consensus BEFORE writing the plan:

Models: gemini-2.5-pro, gpt-5.2 (neutral stance)

Evaluate:

• Effort: 1-13 story points (Fibonacci: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13)
• Risk: Low / Medium / High
• Complexity: Simple / Moderate / Complex

Include estimation in Executive Summary:

## Executive Summary

**Feature:** [Name]
**Owner:** [Team/Individual]
**Estimated Effort:** 8 story points (AI consensus)
**Risk Level:** Medium
**Complexity:** Moderate

**What:** [1-2 sentence description]
**Why:** [Business value]

Agent Hints

Each task should include an optional agent hint for intelligent routing:

Task Template

### Task N: [Task Name]

**Agent Hint:** `task-implementor` (general implementation)
**File:** `/home/user/project/src/exact/path/to/file.ts`
**Effort:** X story points
**Dependencies:** Task M (if any)

#### Current Code (if modifying)
```typescript
// Show the exact code being modified
// Include line numbers if helpful

Test First (TDD)

// Test that should pass AFTER implementation
// Include exact file path for test
// File: src/atomic-crm/contacts/__tests__/newFeature.test.ts
describe('newFeature', () => {
  it('does the expected thing', () => {
    // Test implementation
  });
});

Implementation

// Implementation code or detailed steps
// Include imports, context, and any setup needed

Verification

# Commands to verify success with expected output
just test src/atomic-crm/contacts/__tests__/newFeature.test.ts
# Expected: PASS newFeature > does the expected thing

# Check for TypeScript errors
npx tsc --noEmit
# Expected: No output (success)

Constitution Checklist

• Fail-fast: No retry logic, circuit breakers, or graceful fallbacks
• Zod at boundary: Validation in unifiedDataProvider only, not forms
• Single source: All DB access through unifiedDataProvider
• Form defaults: From zodSchema.partial().parse({})
• Touch targets: All buttons/links are 44x44px minimum (h-11 w-11)
• Semantic colors: No raw hex/oklch values

---

## Dependency Analysis

### Task Graph Format

Show which tasks can run in parallel:

Group 1 (Parallel): ├── Task 1: Create schema ├── Task 2: Create test fixtures └── Task 3: Create type definitions

Group 2 (Sequential - depends on Group 1): └── Task 4: Implement data provider handler

Group 3 (Parallel - depends on Group 2): ├── Task 5: Create form component └── Task 6: Create list component

Group 4 (Sequential - depends on Group 3): └── Task 7: Integration tests

### Dependency Rules

- Tasks in same group can run in parallel
- Groups execute sequentially in order
- Explicitly mark dependencies: `Dependencies: Task 4`
- If no dependencies: `Dependencies: None`

---

## Quality Gates Checklist

**Before a plan is ready:**

- [ ] Every task has TDD test first (test written BEFORE implementation)
- [ ] Every task has constitution checklist
- [ ] Every task has exact file paths (absolute, no "appropriate directory")
- [ ] Every task has verification commands with expected output
- [ ] Every task has optional Agent Hint
- [ ] Zero ambiguity - agent with no context can execute
- [ ] AI estimation completed and included
- [ ] Dependency graph shows parallel opportunities
- [ ] Rollback plan exists for each parallel group

---

## Rollback Plan

Each parallel group needs a rollback strategy:

```markdown
## Rollback Plan

### Group 1 Checkpoint
**Files to restore:** `schema.ts`, `types.ts`
**Command:** `git checkout HEAD -- src/atomic-crm/validation/schema.ts`
**When to rollback:** If any Group 1 task fails verification

### Group 2 Checkpoint
**Files to restore:** `handler.ts`
**Command:** `git stash && git checkout HEAD -- src/providers/handlers/`
**When to rollback:** If data provider integration fails

Success Criteria

Define measurable success:

## Success Criteria

### Automated Verification
```bash
# All tests pass
just test
# Expected: Tests: X passed, 0 failed

# Type check passes
npx tsc --noEmit
# Expected: No output (success)

# Lint passes
just lint
# Expected: No errors

Manual Verification

• Feature accessible at /contacts/create
• Form submits successfully with valid data
• Validation errors display correctly
• Data appears in database after submit

---

## Anti-Patterns to Avoid

**Vague instructions:**
```markdown
# BAD
Create the component in the appropriate directory.

# GOOD
Create the component at `/home/user/project/src/atomic-crm/contacts/ContactSlideOver.tsx`

Missing context:

# BAD
Update the schema.

# GOOD
Update the schema at `/home/user/project/src/atomic-crm/validation/contacts.ts`:
- Add `phone` field with z.string().max(20).optional()
- Add `company_role` field with z.enum(['buyer', 'decision_maker', 'influencer'])

No verification:

# BAD
Test that it works.

# GOOD
Run: `just test src/atomic-crm/contacts/__tests__/ContactCreate.test.tsx`
Expected output: `PASS ContactCreate > submits form with valid data`

Integration with Other Skills

Quick Reference

Core principles:

• Zero context - overcommunicate everything
• Exact file paths - absolute, never relative or vague
• Complete commands with expected output
• Every task includes constitution checklist
• Flag violations in code examples with checkmarks

Plan output location: docs/archive/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md

Quality bar: Plan is ready when a developer who has never seen the codebase can execute every task without asking questions.

Reference Files

For detailed templates and checklists:

• See PLAN_TEMPLATE.md for full plan template
• See QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md for detailed quality gates
• See /write-plan command for interactive plan creation workflow