Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
OpenClaw

geo-hallucination-checker

Detect and annotate hallucinations, unsupported claims, fabricated studies, and incorrect conclusions in text so that AI only cites verifiable, trustworthy content. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to fact-check, validate sources, check for hallucinations, or ensure that generated content is grounded in real evidence, even if they do not explicitly use the word "hallucination".

geoly-geo0 source installs☆ 0 Repository stars

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

SkillHub CLI

skillhub install geoly-geo/geo-hallucination-checker

Inspect the source and compatibility requirements, then follow its installation steps.

Give your agent the source link and ask it to inspect instructions and dependencies before explaining the installation steps.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Overview

The geo-hallucination-checker skill is a hallucination and false-information detection tool. It helps you review any piece of content (articles, landing pages, product descriptions, FAQs, GEO-optimized drafts, etc.) and:

  • Identify unsupported factual claims
  • Flag fabricated or suspicious studies, reports, and statistics
  • Highlight incorrect or overconfident conclusions
  • Suggest safer, evidence-friendly rephrasings

The primary goal is to ensure that AI systems only cite truthful, well-grounded content and clearly mark anything that looks like hallucination risk.

Use this skill aggressively whenever there is any risk that the model might invent data, sources, or conclusions.

When to use this skill

Use geo-hallucination-checker whenever:

  • The user asks you to fact-check, verify, or validate content.
  • The task involves medical, financial, legal, scientific, or technical claims.
  • A draft includes numbers, percentages, dates, or strong superlatives (e.g., “the best”, “number one”, “guaranteed”, “clinically proven”).
  • A text mentions studies, universities, journals, or institutions without clear, verifiable details.
  • You are preparing GEO-optimized content that might be quoted by AI models and needs to be extra reliable.
  • You are asked to rewrite content to avoid hallucinations or false claims.

If you are unsure whether hallucinations are a concern, assume they are and apply this skill.

Inputs this skill supports

This skill can be used on:

  • A single paragraph or answer
  • A long-form article, blog post, or whitepaper
  • A product page or landing page draft
  • FAQ content or knowledge base articles
  • Generated GEO content that will be cited by AI models

The user may also provide:

  • Explicit sources or references (links, documents, citations)
  • Constraints (e.g., “do not use external web search”, “only use these PDFs as ground truth”)...

Source information

Source
github
Repository
openclaw/skills
Path
skills/geoly-geo/geo-hallucination-checker
Version
—
Commit
5728568aa353367b91092d1919bcef9fb2113a1a
Classification source
rules
Status
active
Visibility
public

These signals come from indexed source analysis and may lag behind changes. Check the current source files.

Extracted content

SKILL.md
## Overview

The `geo-hallucination-checker` skill is a hallucination and false-information detection tool.
It helps you review any piece of content (articles, landing pages, product descriptions, FAQs, GEO-optimized drafts, etc.) and:

- Identify **unsupported factual claims**
- Flag **fabricated or suspicious studies, reports, and statistics**
- Highlight **incorrect or overconfident conclusions**
- Suggest **safer, evidence-friendly rephrasings**

The primary goal is to ensure that AI systems only cite **truthful, well-grounded content** and clearly mark anything that looks like hallucination risk.

Use this skill aggressively whenever there is any risk that the model might invent data, sources, or conclusions.

## When to use this skill

Use `geo-hallucination-checker` whenever:

- The user asks you to **fact-check, verify, or validate** content.
- The task involves **medical, financial, legal, scientific, or technical** claims.
- A draft includes **numbers, percentages, dates, or strong superlatives** (e.g., “the best”, “number one”, “guaranteed”, “clinically proven”).
- A text mentions **studies, universities, journals, or institutions** without clear, verifiable details.
- You are preparing **GEO-optimized content** that might be quoted by AI models and needs to be extra reliable.
- You are asked to **rewrite content to avoid hallucinations or false claims**.

If you are unsure whether hallucinations are a concern, **assume they are** and apply this skill.

## Inputs this skill supports

This skill can be used on:

- A single paragraph or answer
- A long-form article, blog post, or whitepaper
- A product page or landing page draft
- FAQ content or knowledge base articles
- Generated GEO content that will be cited by AI models

The user may also provide:

- **Explicit sources or references** (links, documents, citations)
- **Constraints** (e.g., “do not use external web search”, “only use these PDFs as ground truth”)...

Related skills

OpenClaw

dojo.md

edholofy

University for AI agents. 92 courses, 4400+ scenarios, any model via OpenRouter. Auto-training loops generate per-model SKILL.md documents. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Cursor, Windsurf. No fine-tuning req...

OpenClaw

wps-macos-helper

lethehades

macOS WPS Office workflow helper skill for safer document preparation, conversion, export, and compatibility guidance