Rechercher

PythonReactSEOPDF
OpenClaw

agent-team-orchestration

Orchestrate multi-agent teams with defined roles, task lifecycles, handoff protocols, and review workflows. Use when: (1) Setting up a team of 2+ agents with different specializations, (2) Defining task routing and lifecycle (inbox → spec → build → review → done), (3) Creating handoff protocols between agents, (4) Establishing review and quality gates, (5) Managing async communication and artifact sharing between agents.

arminnaimi0 installations selon la source☆ 0 Étoiles du dépôt

Installation

Suivez les instructions du dépôt pour votre agent. Consultez les fichiers et dépendances avant l’installation.

SkillHub CLI

skillhub install arminnaimi/agent-team-orchestration

Examinez la source et la compatibilité, puis suivez les étapes d’installation.

Donnez le lien à votre agent et demandez-lui d’examiner instructions et dépendances avant d’expliquer les étapes.

Voir la source ↗Guides

Instructions

Agent Team Orchestration

Production playbook for running multi-agent teams with clear roles, structured task flow, and quality gates.

Quick Start: Minimal 2-Agent Team

A builder and a reviewer. The simplest useful team.

1. Define Roles
Orchestrator (you) — Route tasks, track state, report results
Builder agent     — Execute work, produce artifacts
2. Spawn a Task
1. Create task record (file, DB, or task board)
2. Spawn builder with:
   - Task ID and description
   - Output path for artifacts
   - Handoff instructions (what to produce, where to put it)
3. On completion: review artifacts, mark done, report
3. Add a Reviewer
Builder produces artifact → Reviewer checks it → Orchestrator ships or returns

That's the core loop. Everything below scales this pattern.

Core Concepts

Roles

Every agent has one primary role. Overlap causes confusion.

Role Purpose Model guidance
Orchestrator Route work, track state, make priority calls High-reasoning model (handles judgment)
Builder Produce artifacts — code, docs, configs Can use cost-effective models for mechanical work
Reviewer Verify quality, push back on gaps High-reasoning model (catches what builders miss)
Ops Cron jobs, standups, health checks, dispatching Cheapest model that's reliable

→ Read references/team-setup.md when defining a new team or adding agents.

Task States

Every task moves through a defined lifecycle:

Inbox → Assigned → In Progress → Review → Done | Failed

Rules:

  • Orchestrator owns state transitions — don't rely on agents to update their own status
  • Every transition gets a comment (who, what, why)
  • Failed is a valid end state — capture why and move on

→ Read references/task-lifecycle.md when designing task flows or debugging stuck tasks.

Handoffs

When work passes b...

Informations sur la source

Source
github
Repository
openclaw/skills
Path
skills/arminnaimi/agent-team-orchestration
Version
—
Commit
7d382776c9ae67d4df508a122a9de6646188f187
Source de classification
rules
Statut
active
Visibilité
public

Ces informations proviennent de l’analyse indexée et peuvent être anciennes. Vérifiez les fichiers actuels.

Contenu extrait

SKILL.md
# Agent Team Orchestration

Production playbook for running multi-agent teams with clear roles, structured task flow, and quality gates.

## Quick Start: Minimal 2-Agent Team

A builder and a reviewer. The simplest useful team.

### 1. Define Roles

```
Orchestrator (you) — Route tasks, track state, report results
Builder agent     — Execute work, produce artifacts
```

### 2. Spawn a Task

```
1. Create task record (file, DB, or task board)
2. Spawn builder with:
   - Task ID and description
   - Output path for artifacts
   - Handoff instructions (what to produce, where to put it)
3. On completion: review artifacts, mark done, report
```

### 3. Add a Reviewer

```
Builder produces artifact → Reviewer checks it → Orchestrator ships or returns
```

That's the core loop. Everything below scales this pattern.

## Core Concepts

### Roles

Every agent has one primary role. Overlap causes confusion.

| Role | Purpose | Model guidance |
|------|---------|---------------|
| **Orchestrator** | Route work, track state, make priority calls | High-reasoning model (handles judgment) |
| **Builder** | Produce artifacts — code, docs, configs | Can use cost-effective models for mechanical work |
| **Reviewer** | Verify quality, push back on gaps | High-reasoning model (catches what builders miss) |
| **Ops** | Cron jobs, standups, health checks, dispatching | Cheapest model that's reliable |

→ *Read [references/team-setup.md](references/team-setup.md) when defining a new team or adding agents.*

### Task States

Every task moves through a defined lifecycle:

```
Inbox → Assigned → In Progress → Review → Done | Failed
```

**Rules:**
- Orchestrator owns state transitions — don't rely on agents to update their own status
- Every transition gets a comment (who, what, why)
- Failed is a valid end state — capture why and move on

→ *Read [references/task-lifecycle.md](references/task-lifecycle.md) when designing task flows or debugging stuck tasks.*

### Handoffs

When work passes b...

Skills associés

OpenClaw

dojo.md

edholofy

University for AI agents. 92 courses, 4400+ scenarios, any model via OpenRouter. Auto-training loops generate per-model SKILL.md documents. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Cursor, Windsurf. No fine-tuning req...

OpenClaw

wps-macos-helper

lethehades

macOS WPS Office workflow helper skill for safer document preparation, conversion, export, and compatibility guidance