Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

analyze-ci-failures

Analyze CI failures on Azure SDK for .NET pull requests and post a comment with how-to-fix instructions. Use when a PR has failing checks, CI is red, or someone asks for help fixing CI.

Azure☆ 5,952 Repository stars5,125 Repository forks

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Skill: analyze-ci-failures

Analyze CI failures on an Azure SDK for .NET pull request and post a GitHub comment with actionable fix instructions.

When Invoked

Trigger phrases: "analyze CI failures", "fix CI", "why is CI failing", "help with CI", "analyze PR checks", "CI is red", "failing checks".

Inputs

The user must provide a PR number, PR URL, or pipeline build ID. If not provided, ask the user.

Workflow

1. Gather information
  • Fetch PR details, check statuses, changed files, and workflow runs using GitHub MCP tools.
  • Extract service directory and package name from changed file paths (sdk/<service>/<package>/).
  • If a pipeline build ID is available (often in auto-generated PR descriptions), use azure-sdk-mcp-azsdk_analyze_pipeline for deeper log analysis.
  • For failed GitHub Actions jobs, use github-mcp-server-get_job_logs with return_content: true to get logs.
2. Identify failures

Classify each failure using the CI check mapping and log symptom patterns below. Also inspect the PR's code directly (e.g., read generated files for compile errors, check for missing scaffolding files).

3. Post a comment

Compose a GitHub comment with:

  • Header: ## 🔍 CI Failure Analysis for PR #<number>
  • Summary table: All checks with ✅ ❌ ⏳ status
  • Per-failure sections: Specific to THIS PR — include actual error messages, affected files, and concrete fix commands with <service>/<package> filled in
  • Quick fix command at the end if applicable

Before posting, check existing comments for ## 🔍 CI Failure Analysis to avoid duplicates.

CI Check Name → Failure Mapping

These are the Azure DevOps and GitHub checks that run on SDK PRs. The check names are repo-specific and not discoverable from general knowledge.

Check Name Pattern What It Validates Key Script
Build Analyze PRBatch Umbrella: code generation, API export, snippets, spelling, CPM, build + pack eng/scripts/CodeChecks.ps1
Verify Generated Code Generated code matches what the generator produces eng/scripts/CodeChecks.ps1
Validate CPM Compliance Central Package Management policy eng/scripts/Validate-CpmCompliance.ps1
Build / Pack Compilation + NuGet packaging (ApiCompat runs during pack only) dotnet pack
Analyze Samples, READMEs, snippets compile eng/scripts/Build-Snippets.ps1
check-spelling Spell-checking changed files cspell via eng/common/scripts/check-spelling-in-changed-files.ps1
verify-links Markdown link validation eng/common/scripts/Verify-Links.ps1
checkenforcer Meta-check: waits for all other checks to pass .github/workflows/event-processor.yml

Log Symptom → Root Cause Mapping

These are exact strings/patterns to search for in CI logs. They are specific to this repo's scripts and not inferrable from general knowledge.

Log symptom Root cause Category
Generated code is not up to date Generated code out of sync Regenerate code
git diff --exit-code failure in CodeChecks Generated or API files changed after re-running scripts Regenerate + export API
error CS####: C# compilation error Build failure — inspect the specific error code
Build FAILED Compilation failure Build failure
MembersMustExist / TypesMustExist ApiCompat breaking change (only surfaces in dotnet pack) API compatibility
ManagePackageVersionsCentrally / VersionOverride CPM policy violation CPM compliance
cspell unknown words Spelling error in code or API surface Spelling
Spell check failed Spelling error in API surface files Spelling
README instruction format / NuGet\\Install-Package README uses wrong install format (must use dotnet add package) README validation
verify-links broken URL Broken markdown links Link verification
Path length exceeded File path > 210 chars File path issue

New Package Checklist

For PRs that introduce a new SDK package (all files are added, no prior version exists), also check for these commonly missing scaffolding files:

  • CHANGELOG.md
  • README.md
  • Directory.Build.props (must import parent props)
  • ci.mgmt.yml (for management-plane) or CI pipeline config
  • api/*.cs (public API surface listings — generated via Export-API.ps1)
  • assets.json (test recording assets)

Without ci.mgmt.yml, the Azure DevOps CI pipeline won't trigger — this is a common reason for checkenforcer staying permanently pending.

Examples

Read the usage examples in the source repository.

View source ↗

Source history

Indexed on
2026-03-11
Index updated
2026-03-11
Branch
main

Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!