Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
Systematic code review guidelines and checklist. Use this skill when reviewing code, conducting pull request reviews, or establishing code quality standards. Provides comprehensive review criteria covering func...
GitHub integration for code review, PR management, and issue tracking (GitHub集成：代码审查、PR管理、Issue追踪)
Perform automated code reviews with best practices, security checks, and refactoring suggestions. Use when reviewing code, checking for vulnerabilities, or analyzing code quality.
Visual inspection and code review for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Triggers on "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Supports both...
Security-focused code review for PRs and diffs - risk classification, blast radius, attack scenarios.
Performs comprehensive code reviews of GitLab merge requests, analyzing code quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when the user says "review" or "code review" or asks to review merge requests...
Process code review findings interactively - fix or skip issues from monty-code-review output. Presents issues in severity order, applies fixes, runs quality checks, and updates review documents with status mar...
Git workflow and pull request specialist. Use when creating PRs, managing branches, establishing git conventions, or improving code review processes.
Pull request workflow and review expertise. Auto-invokes when PRs, code review, merge, or pull request operations are mentioned. Integrates with self-improvement plugin for quality validation.
Expert code review specialist for quality, security, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code changes, ensuring high development standards, or conducting security audits. Provides actionable feedback organi...
Perform comprehensive code reviews covering security, style, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes before commit or merge, auditing existing code, or checking for vulnerabilities.
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREME...
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate impleme...
Create a git commit with automatic AI code review (Codex/Gemini rotation). Triggers on /commit.
Automated validation results analysis for post-commit workflow. Triggers when user requests validation analysis, code review summary, or checking background validation results. Analyzes Biome, TypeScript, and A...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "check for anti-patterns", "audit my code", "find issues in code", "review this file", "check this component", or mentions code review, linting, or...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "check code quality", "find improvements", "refactor code", "fix code issues", "perform code review", "check for bugs", "improve code", "analyze co...
Delegate asynchronous coding tasks to Jules (Google's AI coding agent) to maximize efficiency. Use for code reviews, refactoring, adding tests, bug fixes, and documentation. Proactively suggest Jules delegation...
Pull request swarm management for multi-agent code review and validation. Use for coordinated PR reviews, automated validation, PR-based swarm creation, and intelligent merge workflows.
Deploy specialized AI agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis. Use for automated multi-agent review, security vulnerability analysis, performance bot...
Performs comprehensive code review on git diffs and generates review.md with quality scores, critical issues, performance concerns, and potential bugs. Use when user requests to review changes, check code quali...
Provides code review expertise with constructive feedback. Use when conducting self-reviews before PR creation, quality checks, or best practice validation.
Use when receiving or giving code review feedback, implementing review suggestions, addressing PR comments, or evaluating technical suggestions. Covers both directions - receiving feedback (verify before implem...
Code review checkpoint for conductor gates. Calls codex/review MCP tool to analyze code changes. Returns structured result with pass/fail status, issues found, and whether visual QA is needed.
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.