code-review-assistant
Perform structured, actionable code reviews for Python code with clear findings and suggestions.
Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
Perform structured, actionable code reviews for Python code with clear findings and suggestions.
Comprehensive PR review with 6-7 parallel specialized agents. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking PRs, code review.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or st...
Handle code review feedback with technical rigor. Don't blindly agree - verify before implementing.
Establish and enforce coding standards, best practices, and architectural patterns across the codebase using linters, formatters, and code review processes. Use when setting up ESLint/Prettier, configuring lint...
Conduct rigorous, adversarial code reviews with zero tolerance for mediocrity. Use when users ask to "critically review" my code or a PR, "critique my code", "find issues in my code", or "what's wrong with this...
Expert Python backend code reviewer that identifies over-complexity, duplicates, bad optimizations, and violations of best practices. Use when asked to review Python code quality, check for duplicate code, anal...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review this code", "review PR", "code review", "review staged changes", "blast radius analysis", "check impact of changes", or needs comprehensive context-aware...
Comprehensive code review combining PR review, self-review, and quality checks. Supports reviewing PRs by number or comparing branches.
Implement static code analysis with linters, formatters, and security scanners to catch bugs early. Use when enforcing code standards, detecting security vulnerabilities, or automating code review.
Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, or providing...
Code review guidelines and checklist. Use when reviewing PRs or preparing code for review.
Use during verification phase when conducting thorough code reviews and providing constructive feedback based on universal software quality principles.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "review PR", "code review", "audit code", "check for bugs", "security review", "review my changes", "find issues in this code", "review the diff",...
Tactical code cleanup focusing on type strictness, single responsibility, fail-fast patterns, and DRY. Detects sloppy code, workarounds, silent failures, god classes, and duplication. Use for quick code quality...
Automated code review and security linting integration for CI/CD pipelines using reviewdog. Aggregates findings from multiple security and quality tools (SAST, linters, formatters) into unified code review comm...
Expert code review for quality, security, and maintainability. Use after writing or modifying code, or when user asks for review.
Systematic code review skill checking documentation quality and promoting code reuse
Universal code review - auto-detects scope from git changes, spec, commit, or brief
Provides comprehensive code review covering 6 focused aspects - architecture & design, code quality, security & dependencies, performance & scalability, testing coverage, and documentation & API design. Use thi...
Analyze code quality based on "Clean Code" principles. Identify naming, function size, duplication, over-engineering, and magic number issues with severity ratings and refactoring suggestions. Use when the user...
Systematic and adaptable code review methodology using Language Server Protocol tools. Adapts to available LSP capabilities across programming languages. Use when user asks for code reviews, quality assessments...
Brutally honest code review in the style of Linus Torvalds, focusing on data structures, simplicity, and pragmatism. Use when you want critical, no-nonsense feedback that prioritizes engineering fundamentals ov...
Structured code review covering style, readability, and security concerns with actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests or merge requests to identify issues and suggest improvements.
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.