Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success c...
Code review checklist, severity definitions, and document templates. Load when performing code reviews or defining review criteria.
Coordinate multi-agent code review with specialized perspectives. Use when conducting code reviews, analyzing PRs, evaluating staged changes, or reviewing specific files. Handles security, performance, quality,...
Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
Reviews code for quality, security, performance, and accessibility issues. Use when user mentions reviews, code review, security, performance, quality checks, PRs, diffs, or change review. Do NOT load for: impl...
detailed development workflow with modular patterns for git, code review, testing, documentation, and deployment
Android-specific code review workflow additions for Bitwarden Android. Provides change type refinements, checklist loading, and reference material organization. Complements bitwarden-code-reviewer agent's base...
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review stand...
Code review checkpoint using codex review CLI. Returns structured result with pass/fail status and issues. Use when: 'code review', 'review changes', 'codex review', 'check my code'.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Ensures consistent, construc...
Process code review findings interactively - fix or skip issues from monty-code-review output. Presents issues in severity order, applies fixes, runs quality checks, and updates review documents with status mar...
Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
This skill should be used when the user requests a code review of changed files. Use this to review git-diffed files for security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), performance issues (O(N) complexity, ORM optimiz...
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Fe...
Provides a structured workflow for planning and executing code reviews like a senior engineer. Use when asked to review code, PRs, or plan a code review task.
Orchestrates pitfall prevention skills for common development issues. Auto-triggered during code review to check for TanStack Query, Drizzle ORM, Express API, React, WebSocket, blockchain RPC, and security pitf...
Pull request workflow and review expertise. Auto-invokes when PRs, code review, merge, or pull request operations are mentioned. Integrates with self-improvement plugin for quality validation.
Comprehensive GitHub pull request code review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation. Coordinates security-auditor, perf-analyzer, code-ana...
Follow project-wide development conventions including project structure, version control practices, environment configuration, documentation, dependency management, and code review processes. Use this skill whe...
Use when you need to request a code review for a PR/MR and want a consistent review brief (context, scope, risk areas, test instructions, acceptance criteria) before merge.
GitHub PR utilities for code review workflows
Assesses and responds to incoming code review feedback on PRs (reviewer comments, requested changes), especially when suggestions are unclear, technically questionable, or scope-expanding. Use before implementi...
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate impleme...
Automated code review with best practices, security checks, and quality standards.
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.