Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
This skill enables Claude to conduct a security-focused code review using the security-agent plugin. It analyzes code for potential vulnerabilities like SQL injection, XSS, authentication flaws, and insecure de...
This skill enables Claude to automatically scan source code for potential input validation vulnerabilities. It identifies areas where user-supplied data is not properly sanitized or validated before being used...
Identify and avoid FireCrawl anti-patterns and common integration mistakes. Use when reviewing FireCrawl code for issues, onboarding new developers, or auditing existing FireCrawl integrations for best practice...
Multi-dimensional code review with structured reports. Analyzes correctness, readability, performance, security, testing, and architecture. Triggers on "review code", "code review", "审查代码", "代码审查".
DART contribution workflow - branching, PRs, code review, dual-PR for bugfixes
DART contribution workflow - branching, PRs, code review, dual-PR for bugfixes
Apply systematic performance optimization techniques for Python and Rust code: estimation + profiling, API/bulk design, algorithmic wins, cache-friendly memory layout, fewer allocations, fast paths, caching, an...
Comprehensive code review with security, performance, and quality analysis. Use when users ask to review code, analyze code quality, evaluate pull requests, or mention code review, security analysis, or perform...
Comprehensive code review for diffs. Analyzes changed code for security vulnerabilities, anti-patterns, and quality issues. Auto-detects domain (frontend/backend) from file paths.
Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.
Use when reviewing code for anti-patterns. Keywords: anti-pattern, common mistake, pitfall, code smell, bad practice, code review, is this an anti-pattern, better way to do this, common mistake to avoid, why is...
Use when asking about Rust code style or best practices. Keywords: naming, formatting, comment, clippy, rustfmt, lint, code style, best practice, P.NAM, G.FMT, code review, naming convention, variable naming, f...
CRITICAL: Use for unsafe Rust code review and FFI. Triggers on: unsafe, raw pointer, FFI, extern, transmute, *mut, *const, union, #[repr(C)], libc, std::ffi, MaybeUninit, NonNull, SAFETY comment, soundness, und...
Comprehensive development workflow specialist combining DDD testing, debugging, performance optimization, code review, PR review, and quality assurance into unified development workflows
This skill should be used when users want to search, discover, install, or manage Claude Code skills from the CCPM registry. Triggers include requests like "find skills for PDF", "search for code review skills"...
Performs comprehensive code reviews for Bitwarden iOS projects, verifying architecture compliance, style guidelines, compilation safety, test coverage, and security requirements. Use when reviewing pull request...
John Carmack-level implementation review via rp-cli for current branch changes. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or implementations. Triggers on mentions of code review, implementation review, or PR review...
Google Gemini CLI code review with Gemini 2.5 Pro, 1M token context, CI/CD integration
Mandatory code reviews via /code-review before commits and deploys
OpenAI Codex CLI code review with GPT-5.2-Codex, CI/CD integration
Use when implementing navigation patterns, choosing between NavigationStack and NavigationSplitView, handling deep links, adopting coordinator patterns, or requesting code review of navigation implementation -...
Prevent common testing anti-patterns that undermine test effectiveness and code quality by ensuring tests verify real behavior rather than mock behavior, keeping production code free from test-only pollution, a...
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent fo...
Add a response or note to a roborev code review to document how findings were addressed
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.