Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Ensures consistent, construc...
Automated code review analyzing security, performance, maintainability, and test coverage. Activated during code reviews or when conducting analysis.
Process code review findings interactively - fix or skip issues from monty-code-review output. Presents issues in severity order, applies fixes, runs quality checks, and updates review documents with status mar...
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Fe...
Provides a structured workflow for planning and executing code reviews like a senior engineer. Use when asked to review code, PRs, or plan a code review task.
Use when conducting comprehensive code review for pull requests across multiple quality dimensions. Orchestrates 12-15 specialized reviewer agents across 4 phases using star topology coordination. Covers automa...
Orchestrates pitfall prevention skills for common development issues. Auto-triggered during code review to check for TanStack Query, Drizzle ORM, Express API, React, WebSocket, blockchain RPC, and security pitf...
Pull request workflow and review expertise. Auto-invokes when PRs, code review, merge, or pull request operations are mentioned. Integrates with self-improvement plugin for quality validation.
Automated code review and security linting integration for CI/CD pipelines using reviewdog. Aggregates findings from multiple security and quality tools (SAST, linters, formatters) into unified code review comm...
GitHub PR utilities for code review workflows
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate impleme...
Automated code review with best practices, security checks, and quality standards.
Comprehensive code review expertise. Use when reviewing code, evaluating architecture, or assessing quality. Triggers on review, evaluate, assess, audit, code quality, best practices.
Follow consistent project structure, version control practices, environment configuration, code review processes, and development conventions across the entire application. Use this skill when organizing projec...
Automated code review with security scanning, quality metrics, and best practices analysis. Use when reviewing code for: (1) Security vulnerabilities and common attack vectors, (2) Code quality issues and maint...
Comprehensive code review workflow coordinating quality, security, performance, and documentation reviewers. 4-hour timeline for thorough multi-agent review.
Deep code review with web research to verify against latest ecosystem. Use when user says 'double check against latest', 'verify versions', 'check security', 'review against docs', or needs deep analysis beyond...
Git workflow and pull request specialist. Use when creating PRs, managing branches, establishing git conventions, or improving code review processes.
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREME...
Systematic code review workflow using zen mcp's codex tool. Use this skill when the user explicitly requests "use codex to check the code", "check if the recently generated code has any issues", or "check the c...
Comprehensive PR review with 6-7 parallel specialized agents. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking PRs, code review.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or st...
Use when completing tasks, code reviews, or deployments to verify work with evidence. Collects test results, build outputs, coverage metrics, and exit codes to prove work is complete.
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.