Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
Interactive code review using Google Gemini 3.0 Flash with Conventional Comments methodology. MANDATORY - runs automatically after every code implementation (Edit, Write tools). Provides numbered issues for sel...
Code review workflows with Codex CLI including automated reviews, diff analysis, and PR improvements. Use for code review, quality checks, or automated improvement suggestions.
Multi-perspective code review using Claude, Gemini, and Codex as specialized agents. 5-dimensional analysis (security, performance, maintainability, correctness, style) with LLM-as-judge consensus, quality scor...
GitHub PR utilities for code review workflows
Capable of performing comprehensive code reviews on git commits. Analyzes commit changes, investigates side effects in the codebase, and categorizes findings by severity levels (critical, major, minor, nit).
Comprehensive parallel code review using 5 specialized subagents: general, architectural, TypeScript, product/vision, and TDD/beads compliance
Run before marking coding tasks complete - validates code quality via IDE diagnostics, code review rules, and tests with fast-feedback short-circuiting
Pre-PR code review for branch changes. Use when user wants to review changes before opening a PR, asks to check their branch for issues, or mentions code review. Analyzes diff against base branch for code quali...
Code review agent based on Sandi Metz's object-oriented design principles from "Practical Object-Oriented Design in Ruby" and "99 Bottles of OOP". Use when users request code reviews, ask about OO design princi...
Comprehensive Ruby and Rails code review using Sandi Metz rules and SOLID principles. Automatically runs rubycritic and simplecov, analyzes changed files in current branch vs base branch, identifies OOP violati...
Elite code review agent for comprehensive analysis of code quality, security, performance, and architecture. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code changes, checking for bugs, security vulnerabilities, or perfo...
Use when the user needs technical research, architecture validation, documentation generation, or code review. Default is read-only mode, but can enable auto-approve (-y) for code changes.
Automatically triggered for code reviews, PR analysis, and quality checks. Use when reviewing changes, checking code quality, or preparing commits.
Code quality - patterns, testing, maintainability. Use for code review.
Perform systematic code reviews following best practices and team standards
Best practices for performing thorough, constructive code reviews. Use when reviewing PRs to ensure quality feedback that improves code and helps developers grow.
Use when receiving code review feedback - requires technical evaluation and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Senior Frontend Code Reviewer with 12+ years JavaScript/TypeScript experience. Use when reviewing React/TypeScript code, checking code quality and style, verifying accessibility compliance, ensuring test covera...
Senior Backend Code Reviewer with 12+ years Java experience. Use when reviewing Java/Spring code, checking code quality and style, identifying code smells and anti-patterns, verifying security practices, ensuri...
Rev - Senior Full-Stack Code Reviewer with 12+ years experience in Java/Kotlin and TypeScript/React. Use when reviewing code quality, checking security vulnerabilities, validating style compliance, running stat...
General code review for staged changes or specified files. Use when reviewing pull requests, commits, or code changes across any language.
GitHub PR utilities for code review workflows
systematic code review for correctness, security, style, and performance. Use this when the user asks for a review or before committing significant changes.
Provides the complete code review scoring rubric with 10 weighted categories, severity multipliers, and deduction calculations. Use when performing quantified code reviews, calculating quality scores, or creati...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.