Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
Code review checklist for SwiftUI and Swift PRs. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, verifying Swift/SwiftUI implementations, or conducting PR reviews. Provides prioritized checklist coveri...
Code review workflow using GitHub CLI. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking PR diffs, adding review comments, or approving/requesting changes on PRs.
Use for code review - runs all reviewers in parallel on uncommitted changes
Perform a code review on recent changes
Comprehensive code review framework for evaluating implementations against plans, requirements, and quality standards. Provides structured analysis with prioritized, actionable feedback.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement...
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by verifying work is complete (tests, requirements, code review, TDD...
接收代码审查反馈时使用，在实施建议之前，特别是当反馈不清晰或技术上有疑问时。需要技术严谨和验证，而不是盲目实施。Use when receiving code review feedback - requires technical rigor and verification, not blind imp...
Autonomous code review for best practices, security, performance, and potential issues. Runs in isolation with read-only tools using Opus model. Use when reviewing code, checking PRs, or analysing code quality.
Gate 4 of development cycle - dispatches 5 specialized reviewers (code, business-logic, security, test, nil-safety) in parallel for comprehensive code review feedback.
Confidence-based code review that filters issues to 80+ threshold, eliminating false positives and noise. Reviews implementation against plan or requirements for bugs, quality issues, and project conventions. U...
Controlled batch execution of implementation plans with review checkpoints between phases. Loads plan, critically reviews for issues, executes tasks in batches, then pauses for architect feedback before continu...
Perform thorough code reviews with focus on security, performance, maintainability, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, entire files, or codebase audits across any programming la...
Validation patterns and compliance checking for Kailash SDK including parameter validation, DataFlow pattern validation, connection validation, absolute import validation, workflow structure validation, and sec...
Comprehensive Rust development guidelines based on 6 months of code reviews. Use when writing Rust code, debugging Rust issues, or reviewing Rust PRs. Covers error handling, file I/O safety, type safety pattern...
Apply comprehensive code review checklist covering purpose, design, quality, correctness, security, performance, testing, and documentation. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code reviews, or self-re...
Invoke Codex CLI as a coworker for implementation, brainstorming, specs, and reviews. Use when you want parallel thinking, cheap execution, or a second opinion. Codex tokens are cheaper than yours — delegate ag...
Code reviewer providing objective quality metrics, security analysis, and actionable feedback. Use for code reviews with scoring, linting, type checking, and duplication detection.
ADVISORY validation of code against design principles that linters cannot enforce. Loaded by go-code-reviewer agent for design analysis guidance. Also invoked by @refactoring (after pattern application). Can be...
This skill should be used as REQUIRED Phase 6 of /dev workflow when the implementation is complete and needs code review. Combines spec compliance and code quality checks with confidence-based filtering.
Use when implementing navigation patterns, choosing between NavigationStack and NavigationSplitView, handling deep links, adopting coordinator patterns, or requesting code review of navigation implementation -...
Verification-first approach to code review feedback. Use when receiving review comments during the implement phase. Evaluate suggestions rigorously before implementing - no performative agreement.
Code review methodology for evaluating implementation changes. Use when reviewing code changes for quality, design, correctness, and maintainability. Focuses on changes made during implementation using Conventi...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.