git-workflow
Git workflow and pull request specialist. Use when creating PRs, managing branches, establishing git conventions, or improving code review processes.
Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
Git workflow and pull request specialist. Use when creating PRs, managing branches, establishing git conventions, or improving code review processes.
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREME...
Expert code review specialist for quality, security, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code changes, ensuring high development standards, or conducting security audits. Provides actionable feedback organi...
Performs thorough code reviews with focus on best practices, security, performance, and maintainability. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests, auditing code quality, or getting feedback on implementation...
Systematic code review workflow using zen mcp's codex tool. Use this skill when the user explicitly requests "use codex to check the code", "check if the recently generated code has any issues", or "check the c...
Comprehensive code review methodology with severity classification and confidence thresholds
Perform structured, actionable code reviews for Python code with clear findings and suggestions.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement...
Working effectively with others in coding projects – including code reviews, clear communication, and contributing to shared or open-source codebases.
Structured code review workflow for SRTD development. Use after implementing features, fixing bugs, or before merging to main. Ensures production-readiness through systematic review.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or st...
Use when completing tasks, code reviews, or deployments to verify work with evidence. Collects test results, build outputs, coverage metrics, and exit codes to prove work is complete.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement...
Establish and enforce coding standards, best practices, and architectural patterns across the codebase using linters, formatters, and code review processes. Use when setting up ESLint/Prettier, configuring lint...
Conduct rigorous, adversarial code reviews with zero tolerance for mediocrity. Use when users ask to "critically review" my code or a PR, "critique my code", "find issues in my code", or "what's wrong with this...
Expert Python backend code reviewer that identifies over-complexity, duplicates, bad optimizations, and violations of best practices. Use when asked to review Python code quality, check for duplicate code, anal...
WordPress performance code review and optimization analysis. Use when reviewing WordPress PHP code for performance issues, auditing themes/plugins for scalability, optimizing WP_Query, analyzing caching strateg...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review this code", "review PR", "code review", "review staged changes", "blast radius analysis", "check impact of changes", or needs comprehensive context-aware...
Comprehensive code review combining PR review, self-review, and quality checks. Supports reviewing PRs by number or comparing branches.
Gate 4 of development cycle - dispatches 5 specialized reviewers (code, business-logic, security, test, nil-safety) in parallel for comprehensive code review feedback.
Autonomous plan execution - fresh subagent per task with automated code review between tasks. No human-in-loop, high throughput with quality gates.
Implement static code analysis with linters, formatters, and security scanners to catch bugs early. Use when enforcing code standards, detecting security vulnerabilities, or automating code review.
Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, or providing...
Create and refine OpenCode agents via guided Q&A. Use proactively for agent creation, performance improvement, or configuration design. Examples: - user: "Create an agent for code reviews" → ask about scope, p...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.