Skills matching the name, description or GitHub author.
AI-powered systematic codebase analysis. Combines mechanical structure extraction with Claude's semantic understanding to produce documentation that captures not just WHAT code does, but WHY it exists and HOW i...
Systematic code refactoring skill that transforms complex, hard-to-understand code into clear, well-documented, maintainable code while preserving correctness. Use when users request "readable", "maintainable",...
Create a remediation/fix plan from code review findings in REVIEW.md (especially outputs from the code-review skill).
Expert code reviewer that identifies bugs, security issues, and suggests improvements. Use when asked to review code or changes.
Expert code reviewer that identifies bugs, security issues, and suggests improvements
A universal report skill for saving code review and security review results as Markdown files with checklist-based progress tracking. Differentiates review types by directory (docs/reports/code-review/, docs/re...
OWASP Top 10:2025 web security vulnerability guide. A skill referenced by security specialist subagents during code review, security audits, and vulnerability analysis. Provides background, explanation, prevent...
A comprehensive guide and set of instructions for performing code reviews on the codebase.
General software development practices including code review, testing strategies, and CI/CD integration. Use when implementing features, writing tests, setting up deployment pipelines, or conducting peer review...
Implementation orchestration skill for executing code changes. Use when user has a plan and wants to implement features, bug fixes, or code changes. Requires plan/context from user. Handles VCS, TDD with Aegis...
Guide for creating reliable AI workflows and SOPs. Use when: (1) User wants to create a structured workflow for AI tasks, (2) User needs to build an SOP for complex processes, (3) User wants to ensure their wor...
Write, debug, review and explain source code following object-oriented best practices, DDD principles, and comprehensive testing standards. Use when writing new code, refactoring, debugging, code review, or exp...
Systematic code review workflow for evaluating changes against coding standards. Use when reviewing pull requests, commits, diffs, or code changes. Ensures type-safety, maintainability, readability, and adheren...
Validates TypeScript/React code against dev_instruction_v3.md standards. Checks for anti-patterns like export default, onClick usage, wrapper components, and any types. Use before committing or during code revi...
Comprehensive development workflow specialist combining TDD, debugging, performance optimization, code review, PR review, and quality assurance into unified development workflows
Implements a feature from a plan file in an isolated git worktree with e2e tests, parallel code review, and human review documentation. Use when implementing a planned feature with full validation and isolation...
Comprehensive code review with best practices, security, and maintainability checks. Use when reviewing pull requests, pre-commit code checks, learning code review techniques, improving code quality, or perform...
Create a template file for human reviewers to write free-form feedback before AI code review.
Conduct thorough, actionable code reviews that catch real problems without drowning in noise
Conduct structured implementation postmortems to gather feedback on architecture conformance, library friction, and tooling effectiveness. Use when reviewing completed implementations, PRs, or development phase...
Spawn parallel Claude Code sessions on git worktrees to review multiple projects simultaneously. Use when you have a monorepo or multi-project repo and want to run automated code reviews in parallel without man...
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement...
Opinionated constraints for writing maintainable, testable code. Apply MTE principles, avoid over-engineering, guide refactoring, and provide code review checklists. Use when users write code, refactor, or need...
GitHub development workflow best practices. Use when creating commits, pull requests, branches, reviewing code, managing issues, or any git/GitHub operations. Provides standards for commit messages, PR descript...
The default order uses GitHub repository stars from our indexed data. Stars belong to the source repository and may be shared by multiple skills. They indicate repository interest, not skill installs or an independent quality score.