name: improve-agent description: Analyze past session files to find recurring AI agent issues and fix them via AGENTS.md updates, new skills, or code/infra changes. Use when asked to improve agent workflow, find recurring problems, optimize AGENTS.md, create skills from session patterns, or understand what went wrong across sessions.

Improve Agent

Analyze past pi coding sessions to find recurring agent issues, then fix them by updating AGENTS.md, creating new skills, or improving code/infra.

Note: This skill is pi-specific. It reads pi session files from ~/.pi/agent/sessions/ and produces AGENTS.md entries, new skills, or infrastructure fixes.

How It Works

Pi stores every session as a JSONL file in ~/.pi/agent/sessions/<mangled-cwd>/. Each session captures tool calls (bash, read, edit, write), tool results (with success/failure), user messages, assistant reasoning, and compaction summaries. By analyzing patterns across sessions, we identify where the agent repeatedly struggles and fix the root causes.

Extraction Script

python3 {baseDir}/extract.py [options]

Auto-discovers the sessions directory from $PWD. Use --sessions-dir to override.

Modes

Common Options

Output Format

All output includes JSONL line references (L:NNN or session:LNNN) and the full filepath to the session file (as a header per session, or as a legend in stats mode). This lets you jump from any finding directly to the raw data.

To drill into a specific event with the built-in context viewer:

python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --context 42 --session-file /path/to/session.jsonl

Or manually with jq/sed:

sed -n '42p' /path/to/session.jsonl | python3 -m json.tool

Workflow

Follow these steps in order. Present findings to the user after each step.

Step 1: Overview and Context

python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --summary

Read the project's AGENTS.md if it exists. Understand what guidance the agent already has.

Step 2: Find Recurring Patterns

Run the frequency analyses and check user corrections:

python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --commands --stats
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --failures --stats
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --reads --stats
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --corrections

Look for:

• High frequency, many sessions: agent doing the same thing over and over
• Recurring failures: same errors across sessions
• Repeated file reads: agent can't find what it needs
• Command variations: same intent, many spellings (e.g. make test | tail -5, make test | tail -10, make test | tail -20 — noisy output problem)
• User corrections: what the user aborted and redirected — these reveal cases where the agent technically succeeded but did the wrong thing

Step 3: Understand the Stories

For the top patterns, use sequences to see what happened:

# See error narratives
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --sequences --match "ERROR"

# Deep-dive into specific patterns
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --commands --match "git add"
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --failures --match "syntax|paren|not found"

The sequence view shows:

• USER messages — what the user asked for or complained about
• BASH/EDIT/READ/WRITE — what the agent did
• !! ERROR — where things went wrong (ground truth: non-zero exit / tool error)
• Context before and after failures reveals the root cause

Also check compaction summaries for session-level context:

python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --compactions

Step 3a: Zoom Into Specific Moments

When a sweep surfaces something interesting at a specific line, use --context to see the full untruncated picture — complete tool output, full user messages, full assistant reasoning and thinking:

# The filepath is shown in every session header — copy it directly
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --context 42 --session-file /path/to/session.jsonl

# Wider window for complex sequences
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --context 42 --session-file /path/to/session.jsonl --window 10

This is the primary drill-down tool. Use it whenever a line number catches your attention in the sweep output.

Step 3b: Go Off-Script — Investigate the Raw JSONL

--context covers most drill-down needs, but sometimes you need to ask questions it can't answer — correlating events far apart in a session, counting patterns across the whole file, or extracting specific fields. For those, go straight to the JSONL with jq, grep, or python one-liners.

Session files live in ~/.pi/agent/sessions/<mangled-cwd>/. Each line is a self-contained JSON object. Key fields:

type: "message" | "compaction" | "session" | ...
message.role: "user" | "assistant" | "toolResult"
message.content[].type: "text" | "toolCall"
message.content[].name: "bash" | "read" | "edit" | "write" | ...
message.isError: true/false  (on toolResult messages)

Example investigations:

# Get full context around a suspicious line
S=~/.pi/agent/sessions/<dir>/<file>.jsonl
sed -n '40,50p' "$S" | jq -r '.message.content[]?.text // empty' | head -40

# All user messages (complaints, corrections, instructions)
jq -r 'select(.type=="message") | select(.message.role=="user")
  | .message.content[]? | select(.type=="text") | .text' "$S"

# Full error output for a specific toolResult (not truncated)
sed -n '42p' "$S" | jq -r '.message.content[].text'

# All tool calls in order with their names (quick narrative)
jq -r 'select(.type=="message") | select(.message.role=="assistant")
  | .message.content[]? | select(.type=="toolCall")
  | "\(.name): \(.arguments | tostring | .[0:120])"' "$S"

# Count consecutive edits to the same file (struggle detector)
jq -r 'select(.type=="message") | select(.message.role=="assistant")
  | .message.content[]? | select(.type=="toolCall")
  | select(.name=="edit") | .arguments.path' "$S" \
  | uniq -c | sort -rn | head

# All toolResult errors with full output
jq -r 'select(.type=="message") | select(.message.role=="toolResult")
  | select(.message.isError==true)
  | "[\(.message.toolName)] \(.message.content[0].text[0:300])"' "$S"

# What did the assistant say right after an error? (reaction pattern)
# Use line numbers: if error is at L42, check L43
sed -n '43p' "$S" | jq -r '.message.content[]?
  | select(.type=="text") | .text[0:300]'

# Find retry/struggle loops: same command repeated within 10 lines
jq -r 'select(.type=="message") | select(.message.role=="assistant")
  | .message.content[]? | select(.type=="toolCall")
  | select(.name=="bash") | .arguments.command' "$S" \
  | uniq -c | sort -rn | head

Trust your judgment. If the extract.py output raises a question, answer it directly from the data. The JSONL has everything — full tool output, full user messages, full assistant reasoning. Don't stay at the summary level when the details matter.

Step 4: Rank Issues by Impact

For each issue found, assess:

• Frequency: how many times it occurs
• Sessions affected: how many separate sessions
• Cost per occurrence: how many commands wasted recovering

Rank by frequency × sessions. Focus on the top issues.

Step 5: Present and Resolve One by One

For each issue, present to the user:

1. What: the observable pattern with quantitative data
2. Why: root cause analysis
3. Options: 2-3 resolution approaches

Choosing the Right Resolution

Ask two questions:

Is the tool/command/infrastructure itself broken or misleading? Fix it directly — Makefile target, helper script, git hook, config file, whatever it takes. The agent shouldn't need guidance to work around broken tooling.

Is it knowledge the agent needs? Two options, depending on scope:

• AGENTS.md entry — for concise, project-specific guidance the agent needs every session. See "Writing Good AGENTS.md Entries" below.
• New skill — for rich, reusable workflows that span sessions or projects. See "Step 5b: Create a Skill" below.

Often the answer is both: fix the broken command AND document the correct usage. Present options to the user, wait for them to pick, then implement.

Verify the change works:

# Test that the updated AGENTS.md is loaded and understood
pi -p "Read AGENTS.md and confirm you see the new guidance about <topic>"

# Or test the specific behavior the new guidance should produce
pi -p "Show me how you would <thing the agent kept getting wrong>"

Then commit and move to the next issue.

Step 5b: Create a Skill

When analysis reveals a recurring multi-step workflow — the agent writing the same helper scripts across sessions, following the same complex sequence of commands, or needing the same domain knowledge repeatedly — that's a skill, not an AGENTS.md entry.

Recognizing skill opportunities:

• The agent writes similar ad-hoc scripts in 3+ sessions
• A workflow requires 5+ steps that the agent reinvents each time
• Domain-specific knowledge (API patterns, tool quirks) keeps being rediscovered
• The pattern appears across multiple projects (use --projects to check)

Creating the skill:

1. Extract intent from session data. The sessions already show what the skill needs to do. Look at the successful command sequences, the scripts the agent wrote, and the user corrections that refined the approach.

2. Scaffold the SKILL.md. Use proper frontmatter:

   ---
   name: my-skill
   description: What it does and when to trigger. Be specific about
     contexts — include phrases users would say. Err on the side of
     triggering too often rather than too rarely.
   ---
   

3. Write the workflow. Translate the successful patterns from session data into clear steps. Explain why each step matters — the agent is smart and responds better to reasoning than rigid instructions.

4. Bundle repeated scripts. If the agent kept writing the same helper script across sessions, write it once and put it in the skill directory. Reference it from SKILL.md with {baseDir}/scripts/helper.py.

5. Test it. Run a quick pi session to verify the skill triggers and the workflow produces good results:

   pi -p "<prompt that should trigger the skill>"
   

6. Keep it lean. SKILL.md under 500 lines. If it grows beyond that, split into a main SKILL.md and references/ directory with detailed docs that get loaded on demand.

Step 6: Verify Changes Worked

After implementing fixes, verify they had the intended effect in subsequent sessions. Use --before/--after to compare windows:

# Check the pattern before the fix
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --failures --match "the-pattern" --before 2026-03-01

# Check after the fix
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --failures --match "the-pattern" --after 2026-03-01

If the pattern still appears at similar frequency, the fix didn't work. Investigate why — the root cause may be different from what you assumed.

This step is optional during the initial analysis but valuable as a follow-up in a later session.

Multi-Project Analysis

When the user suspects patterns span multiple projects, or wants to identify cross-cutting skill opportunities:

# Analyze failures across two projects
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --failures --stats \
  --projects ~/co/project-a ~/co/project-b

# Check corrections across projects
python3 {baseDir}/extract.py --corrections \
  --projects ~/co/project-a ~/co/project-b --last 5

Each project directory gets resolved to its pi sessions directory automatically. Output labels include the project name for context.

Cross-project patterns are strong signals for global skills (placed in ~/.agents/skills/) or global AGENTS.md entries.

Writing Good AGENTS.md Entries

• Concise: 3-5 lines per topic. The agent reads this every session.
• Actionable: Commands to run, not explanations of why.
• Specific: Exact command syntax, not "use the right flags."
• No hardcoded paths: Use $PWD, environment variables, or discovery snippets.
• Grouped: Related guidance together (testing, git, reference code, etc.)