vercel-design-guidelines
Check web interfaces against Vercel's design guidelines. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", "check my site against best practices", or "apply Vercel design guidelines".
Installation
Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.
View source ↗GuidesSkill instructions
Vercel Design Guidelines
Review web interfaces against Vercel's comprehensive design guidelines and propose fixes.
How It Works
- Read the user's code (components, CSS, HTML)
- Check against Vercel design guidelines (interactions, animations, layout, content, forms, performance, design, copywriting)
- Report violations with specific line references
- Propose concrete fixes with code examples
Usage
When a user asks to review their UI or check against design guidelines:
- Fetch the guidelines from both URLs below
- Read the relevant source files (components, styles, HTML)
- Analyze the code against each applicable guideline category
- Report findings grouped by category with severity
Guidelines URLs:
- Structured rules: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vercel-labs/web-interface-guidelines/refs/heads/main/AGENTS.md (MUST/SHOULD/NEVER directives)
- Full details: https://vercel.com/design/guidelines (rich explanations and examples)
Fetch both for comprehensive coverage — AGENTS.md for structured checklist, full site for context and examples.
Audit Categories
Interactions
- Keyboard accessibility
- Focus management
- Hit targets (minimum 24px, 44px on mobile)
- Loading states
- URL persistence
Animations
- Reduced motion support (
prefers-reduced-motion) - GPU acceleration
- Easing functions
- Interruptibility
- No
transition: all
Layout
- Optical adjustment
- Alignment
- Responsive testing
- Safe areas
Content
- Inline help
- Skeleton states
- Empty states
- Typography
- Accessibility
Forms
- Labels (always associated with inputs)
- Validation
- Autocomplete
- Error handling
- Submit behavior
Performance
- Re-renders
- Layout thrashing
- Virtualization
- Preloading
Design
- Shadows
- Borders
- Border radii
- Contrast (APCA standards)
- Color accessibility
Copywriting
- Active voice
- Title case
- Clarity
- Error messaging (show how to fix, not just what's wrong)
Output Format
Present findings as:
## {Category} Issues
### {Severity}: {Guideline Name}
**File:** `path/to/file.tsx:42`
**Issue:** {Description of the violation}
**Guideline:** {Brief guideline reference}
**Fix:**
```{language}
{Proposed code fix}
Severity levels:
- **Critical**: Accessibility violations, broken functionality
- **Warning**: UX issues, performance concerns
- **Suggestion**: Polish, best practices
## Example Review
Interactions Issues
Critical: Keyboard Accessibility
File: components/Modal.tsx:28
Issue: Modal lacks focus trap - keyboard users can tab outside
Guideline: Implement focus traps per WAI-ARIA patterns
Fix:
// Add focus trap using @radix-ui/react-focus-guards or similar
import { FocusScope } from "@radix-ui/react-focus-scope";
<FocusScope trapped>
<ModalContent>{children}</ModalContent>
</FocusScope>;
Warning: Loading State Duration
File: components/Button.tsx:15
Issue: No minimum loading duration - causes flicker on fast responses
Guideline: Add 150-300ms delay and 300-500ms minimum visibility
Fix:
const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
const minimumLoadingTime = 300;
async function handleClick() {
setIsLoading(true);
const start = Date.now();
await action();
const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
if (elapsed < minimumLoadingTime) {
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, minimumLoadingTime - elapsed));
}
setIsLoading(false);
}
## Quick Checklist
For rapid reviews, check these high-impact items first:
- [ ] All interactive elements keyboard accessible
- [ ] Visible focus rings on focusable elements
- [ ] Hit targets ≥24px (44px on mobile)
- [ ] Form inputs have associated labels
- [ ] Loading states don't flicker
- [ ] `prefers-reduced-motion` respected
- [ ] No `transition: all`
- [ ] Errors show how to fix, not just what's wrong
- [ ] Color contrast meets APCA standards
- [ ] No zoom disabled
## Present Results to User
After reviewing:
Design Guidelines Audit
Reviewed {N} files against Vercel design guidelines.
Summary
- Critical: {N} issues
- Warning: {N} issues
- Suggestions: {N} items
{Detailed findings by category}
Recommended Priority
- {First critical fix}
- {Second critical fix} ...
Examples
Read the usage examples in the source repository.
View source ↗Source history
- Indexed on
- 2026-01-20
- Index updated
- 2026-02-03
- Branch
- main
Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!