ln-634-test-coverage-auditor
Coverage Gaps audit worker (L3). Identifies missing tests for critical paths (Money 20+, Security 20+, Data Integrity 15+, Core Flows 15+). Returns list of untested critical business logic with priority justification.
Installation
Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.
View source ↗GuidesSkill instructions
Coverage Gaps Auditor (L3 Worker)
Specialized worker identifying missing tests for critical business logic.
Purpose & Scope
- Worker in ln-630 coordinator pipeline
- Audit Coverage Gaps (Category 4: High Priority)
- Identify untested critical paths
- Classify by category (Money, Security, Data, Core Flows)
- Calculate compliance score (X/10)
Inputs (from Coordinator)
Receives contextStore with critical paths classification, codebase structure, test file list.
Domain-aware fields (NEW):
-
domain_mode:"domain-aware"|"global"(optional, defaults to "global") -
current_domain:{name, path}when domain_mode="domain-aware"
Example contextStore (domain-aware):
{
"tech_stack": {...},
"best_practices": {...},
"testFilesMetadata": [...],
"codebase_root": "/project",
"domain_mode": "domain-aware",
"current_domain": {
"name": "orders",
"path": "src/orders"
}
}
Workflow
-
Parse context from contextStore
- Extract tech_stack, best_practices, testFilesMetadata
-
Determine scan_path (NEW):
IF domain_mode == "domain-aware": scan_path = codebase_root + "/" + current_domain.path domain_name = current_domain.name ELSE: scan_path = codebase_root domain_name = null
-
Identify critical paths in scan_path (not entire codebase)
- Scan production code in
scan_pathfor money/security/data keywords - All Grep/Glob patterns use
scan_path(not codebase_root) - Example:
Grep(pattern="payment|refund|discount", path=scan_path)
- Scan production code in
-
Check test coverage for each critical path
- Search ALL test files for coverage (tests may be in different location than production code)
- Match by function name, module name, or test description
-
Collect missing tests
- Tag each finding with
domain: domain_name(if domain-aware)
- Tag each finding with
-
Calculate score
-
Return JSON with domain metadata
- Include
domainandscan_pathfields (if domain-aware)
- Include
Critical Paths Classification
1. Money Flows (Priority 20+)
What: Any code handling financial transactions
Examples:
- Payment processing (
/payment,processPayment()) - Discounts/promotions (
calculateDiscount(),applyPromoCode()) - Tax calculations (
calculateTax(),getTaxRate()) - Refunds (
processRefund(),/refund) - Invoices/billing (
generateInvoice(),createBill()) - Currency conversion (
convertCurrency())
Min Priority: 20
Why Critical: Money loss, fraud, legal compliance
2. Security Flows (Priority 20+)
What: Authentication, authorization, encryption
Examples:
- Login/logout (
/login,authenticate()) - Token refresh (
/refresh-token,refreshAccessToken()) - Password reset (
/forgot-password,resetPassword()) - Permissions/RBAC (
checkPermission(),hasRole()) - Encryption/hashing (custom crypto logic, NOT bcrypt/argon2)
- API key validation (
validateApiKey())
Min Priority: 20
Why Critical: Security breach, data leak, unauthorized access
3. Data Integrity (Priority 15+)
What: CRUD operations, transactions, validation
Examples:
- Critical CRUD (
createUser(),deleteOrder(),updateProduct()) - Database transactions (
withTransaction()) - Data validation (custom validators, NOT framework defaults)
- Data migrations (
runMigration()) - Unique constraints (
checkDuplicateEmail())
Min Priority: 15
Why Critical: Data corruption, lost data, inconsistent state
4. Core User Journeys (Priority 15+)
What: Multi-step flows critical to business
Examples:
- Registration → Email verification → Onboarding
- Search → Product details → Add to cart → Checkout
- Upload file → Process → Download result
- Submit form → Approval workflow → Notification
Min Priority: 15
Why Critical: Broken user flow = lost customers
Audit Rules
1. Identify Critical Paths
Process:
- Scan codebase for money-related keywords:
payment,refund,discount,tax,price,currency - Scan for security keywords:
auth,login,password,token,permission,encrypt - Scan for data keywords:
transaction,validation,migration,constraint - Scan for user journeys: multi-step flows in routes/controllers
2. Check Test Coverage
For each critical path:
- Search test files for matching test name/description
- If NO test found → add to missing tests list
- If test found but inadequate (only positive, no edge cases) → add to gaps list
3. Categorize Gaps
Severity by Priority:
- CRITICAL: Priority 20+ (Money, Security)
- HIGH: Priority 15-19 (Data, Core Flows)
- MEDIUM: Priority 10-14 (Important but not critical)
4. Provide Justification
For each missing test:
- Explain WHY it's critical (money loss, security breach, etc.)
- Suggest test type (E2E, Integration, Unit)
- Estimate effort (S/M/L)
Scoring Algorithm
critical_paths = count of critical paths
tested_paths = count of critical paths with tests
coverage_percentage = (tested_paths / critical_paths) * 100
score = coverage_percentage / 10 // 100% coverage = 10 score
score = max(0, min(10, score))
Output Format
Global mode output:
{
"category": "Coverage Gaps",
"score": 6,
"critical_paths_total": 25,
"tested_paths": 15,
"untested_paths": 10,
"coverage_percentage": 60,
"findings": [
{
"severity": "CRITICAL",
"category": "Money",
"missing_test": "E2E: Payment with discount code",
"location": "services/payment.ts:processPayment()",
"priority": 25,
"justification": "Money calculation with discount logic — high risk of incorrect total",
"test_type": "E2E",
"effort": "M"
}
]
}
Domain-aware mode output (NEW):
{
"category": "Coverage Gaps",
"score": 7,
"domain": "orders",
"scan_path": "src/orders",
"critical_paths_total": 12,
"tested_paths": 8,
"untested_paths": 4,
"coverage_percentage": 67,
"findings": [
{
"severity": "CRITICAL",
"category": "Money",
"missing_test": "E2E: applyDiscount() with edge cases",
"location": "src/orders/services/order.ts:45",
"priority": 25,
"justification": "Discount calculation in orders domain — high risk of incorrect total",
"test_type": "E2E",
"effort": "M",
"domain": "orders"
},
{
"severity": "HIGH",
"category": "Data Integrity",
"missing_test": "Integration: orderTransaction() rollback",
"location": "src/orders/repositories/order.ts:78",
"priority": 18,
"justification": "Data corruption risk in orders domain",
"test_type": "Integration",
"effort": "M",
"domain": "orders"
}
]
}
Critical Rules
-
Domain-aware scanning: If
domain_mode="domain-aware", scan ONLYscan_pathproduction code (not entire codebase) -
Tag findings: Include
domainfield in each finding when domain-aware - Test search scope: Search ALL test files for coverage (tests may be in different location than production code)
- Match by name: Use function name, module name, or test description to match tests to production code
Definition of Done
- contextStore parsed (including domain_mode and current_domain)
- scan_path determined (domain path or codebase root)
- Critical paths identified in scan_path (Money, Security, Data, Core Flows)
- Test coverage checked for each critical path
- Missing tests collected with severity, priority, justification, domain
- Score calculated
- JSON returned to coordinator with domain metadata
Version: 3.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-12-23
Examples
Read the usage examples in the source repository.
View source ↗Source history
- Indexed on
- 2026-03-11
- Index updated
- 2026-03-11
- Branch
- main
Index and sync dates describe this directory. View the source repository for code history.
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!