按技能名称、说明或 GitHub 作者匹配的结果。
Separation of Concerns principle for TypeScript code review and refactoring. Use when detecting mixed responsibilities, business logic in UI components, infrastructure code in domain layer, or tightly coupled m...
SOLID principles for TypeScript code review and refactoring. Use when reviewing code architecture, detecting design violations, refactoring classes/modules/hooks, or improving code maintainability. Covers SRP,...
Process external code review feedback systematically. Use when responding to PR comments, review feedback, or technical suggestions from reviewers.
Use when reviewing code quality, before refactoring, when complexity increases, when code feels "hard to change", during code review, or when onboarding to unfamiliar code - systematic identification of code sm...
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent fo...
AI agent handles code review feedback professionally by categorizing, responding appropriately, and extracting learnings. Use when PR feedback arrives, addressing reviewer comments, or improving from feedback.
AI agent requests effective code reviews through proper preparation, clear descriptions, and appropriate reviewer selection. Use when creating PRs, requesting feedback, or submitting for review.
The agent implements stacked diffs (stacked PRs) for breaking large changes into reviewable chunks. Use when working on complex features, managing dependent changes, or optimizing code review flow.
Review code for quality, style, and potential issues. Use when code has been written or modified, when user asks for code review, or when TDD autonomous mode needs quality assessment. Supports configurable stri...
Rust code review patterns from corrode.dev (16 articles)
Implements Adversarial Agile Processes (AAP) for document and code review. Challenges assumptions, questions decisions, and suggests improvements. Use when reviewing PRs, documentation, or architectural decisio...
Engineering standards and code governance enforcement. Triggers during code review discussions, PR descriptions, commit preparation, and when discussing code quality. Ensures compliance with standards.md and ru...
Perform code review using CodeRabbit. Must use this skill if instructed to perform a CodeRabbit review.
MUST use this skill when user asks to check/review PR comments, address reviewer feedback, fix review issues, or respond to code review. Fetches unresolved review comments from GitHub PR for the current branch.
Review GitHub pull requests with VSCode integration. Use when the user asks to "review a PR", "review PRs", "check pull requests", or wants AI-assisted code review with clickable navigation and one-click commen...
Automatic code review and fixes before showing to user. Use when: code generation is complete, before preview. Triggers: internal use only.
Code review workflow and best practices. Use when: reviewing PRs, receiving feedback, or preparing code for review. Triggers: "code review", "review", "pr review", "pull request", "feedback", "review changes".
Enterprise systematic code review orchestrator with TRUST 5 principles, multi-language support, Context7 integration, AI-powered quality checks, SOLID principle validation, security vulnerability detection, and...
Enterprise comprehensive code review automation with AI-powered quality analysis, TRUST 5 enforcement, multi-language support, Context7 integration, security scanning, performance analysis, test coverage valida...
This skill should be used when CodeRabbit code review feedback needs to be processed and fixed systematically. Use after running `coderabbit --plain` to automatically save feedback, analyze issues using MCP too...
Research-backed code review skill with OWASP Top 10 security checks, SAST tool integration (SonarQube, CodeQL, Snyk), performance pattern detection, and automated quality standards enforcement. Auto-invoked for...
Expert code review specialist. Reviews for quality and intent alignment. Use immediately after writing or modifying code, or when user requests code review. Handles both uncommitted changes and targeted file re...
Methodical approach to finding security vulnerabilities through source code review and static analysis
Comprehensive code review with security, performance, and maintainability focus. Produces structured review with APPROVE, NEEDS WORK, or BLOCK verdict.
默认按已收录数据中的 GitHub 仓库 Stars 排序。Stars 属于来源仓库，同一仓库的多个技能可能共享相同数值；它反映仓库关注度，不代表单个技能的安装量或质量评分。