techdebt-scan | Skill Performance & Reviews | TopRankSkills

TopRank Skills

Home / Skills / tools / techdebt-scan

techdebt-scan

maintained by dmitryprg-ai

star 5 account_tree 1 verified_user MIT License
bolt View GitHub

name: techdebt-scan description: Scan codebase for technical debt and fix safely with TDD. Use to find oversized files, duplicated code, code smells, and refactor safely. Workflow - SCAN, TEST CASES, REFACTOR, VERIFY. Keywords - techdebt, tech debt, duplicates, code quality audit. disable-model-invocation: true

Technical Debt Scanner

Find and safely fix technical debt using TDD approach.

Order: SCAN -> TEST CASES -> REFACTOR -> VERIFY (do NOT skip steps!)

Phase 1: SCAN

Run scan scripts:

bash .cursor/skills/techdebt-scan/scripts/scan-large-files.sh
bash .cursor/skills/techdebt-scan/scripts/find-todos.sh

Then check for:

  • Files > 300 lines (routes, services, components > 200 lines)
  • Duplicated code patterns (grep for identical blocks > 5 lines)
  • Functions > 50 lines
  • Deep nesting (> 3 levels)
  • Files with > 10 exports
  • Magic numbers/strings

Scan Results Template

## TECHDEBT SCAN RESULTS — [date]

### Oversized Files
| File | Lines | Limit | Severity |
|------|-------|-------|----------|
| <path> | X | Y | HIGH/MED |

### Duplicate Code
| Pattern | File 1 | File 2 | Lines | Severity |
|---------|--------|--------|-------|----------|
| <desc> | <path> | <path> | X | HIGH/MED |

### Code Smells
| Type | Location | Description | Severity |
|------|----------|-------------|----------|
| Long function | <path>:<line> | X lines | MED |

### Exceptions (NOT violations)
| File | Exception Type | Reason |
|------|---------------|--------|
| <path> | High Cohesion Monolith | <reason> |

High Cohesion Monolith criteria:

  • Single business responsibility (not a god-object)
  • High method cohesion -- methods share common state
  • Splitting requires full test coverage for safety

Phase 2: PRIORITIZE

Severity Impact Effort Priority
HIGH Blocks development Low P0 -- Fix now
HIGH Blocks development High P1 -- Plan
MED Reduces quality Low P2 -- Quick win
MED Reduces quality High P3 -- Backlog
LOW Cosmetic Any P4 -- Optional

Phase 3: TEST CASES (MANDATORY before refactoring)

Write tests BEFORE any code changes. For each selected issue:

  1. Create test cases table
  2. Write failing tests
  3. Verify tests FAIL (code not changed yet)

Phase 4: REFACTOR

  1. Small steps -- one file at a time
  2. Run tests after EACH change
  3. Commit after each green test

Phase 5: VERIFY

## TECHDEBT FIX VERIFICATION
| ID | Description | Tests Written | Tests Passing | Status |
|----|-------------|---------------|---------------|--------|
| D1 | <desc> | X | X | OK |

- [ ] `npm run build` -- success
- [ ] `npm run lint` -- 0 errors
- [ ] `npm test` -- all passing

FORBIDDEN

  • Refactoring without SCAN first
  • Refactoring without TEST CASES
  • Writing tests AFTER refactoring
  • "Build passed = everything works"

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Skill Details

GitHub Stars 5
GitHub Forks 1
Created Mar 2026
Last Updated 3个月前
tools tools automation tools

Related Skills

specs-gen
chevron_right
glm-coding-agent
chevron_right
creating-pr
chevron_right
writing-skills
chevron_right
reviewing-pr
chevron_right

Build your own?

Join 12,000+ developers contributing to the Claude ecosystem.