mflux-manual-testing | Skill Performance & Reviews | TopRankSkills

TopRank Skills

Home / Skills / tools / mflux-manual-testing

mflux-manual-testing

maintained by filipstrand

star 1.8k account_tree 117 verified_user MIT License
bolt View GitHub

name: mflux-manual-testing description: Manually validate mflux CLIs by exercising the changed paths and reviewing output images/artifacts.

mflux manual testing

Some regressions (especially in CLIs and image IO) are easiest to catch by running the commands and visually inspecting outputs. This skill provides a lightweight, change-driven manual test checklist.

When to Use

  • You changed any CLI entrypoint(s) under src/mflux/models/**/cli/.
  • You touched callbacks (e.g. stepwise output, memory saver) or metadata/image saving.
  • Tests are green but you want confidence in real command usage.

Strategy (change-driven)

  • Identify what changed on your branch (new flags, default behavior changes, new callbacks, new models).
  • Only run manual checks for the touched areas; don’t try to exercise every CLI.
  • Prefer 1–2 seeds and a small step count (e.g. 4) for fast iteration, unless the change affects convergence/quality.
  • Before manual CLI testing, reinstall the local tool executables so you’re testing the latest code:
uv tool install --force --editable --reinstall --prerelease=allow .

Core CLI checks (pick what’s relevant)

  • Basic generation: run the CLI once with a representative prompt and confirm the output is not “all noise”.
  • Model saving (if relevant): if you touched weight loading/saving or model definitions, run mflux-save for the affected model(s) and verify:
    • the output directory is created
    • the command completes without missing-file errors
  • Run from disk (if relevant): if you touched save/load paths or model resolution, generate from a locally saved model directory by passing --model /full/path/to/saved-model and confirm it runs and produces a sane image.
  • Stepwise outputs (if relevant): run with --stepwise-image-output-dir and confirm:
    • step images are written for each step
    • the final step image matches the final output image qualitatively
    • the composite image is created
  • Low-RAM path (if relevant): run with --low-ram and confirm:
    • generation completes
    • output quality is sane (no unexpected all-noise output)
  • Metadata (if relevant): run with --metadata and confirm the .json is emitted and looks consistent.

Output review (human-in-the-loop)

  • Always point the human reviewer at:
    • the final output image path
    • any stepwise directory / composites
    • any metadata JSON files
  • Ask the human to visually confirm “looks correct” rather than attempting pixel-perfect parity manually.

Notes

  • If the installed uv tool executable behaves differently from uv run python -m ..., prefer the local module run to isolate environment/tooling issues.
  • If you need to reinstall the local tool executables, see the repo rules for the current recommended command.

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Skill Details

GitHub Stars 1.8k
GitHub Forks 117
Created Jan 2026
Last Updated 5个月前
tools tools code quality

Related Skills

creating-pr
chevron_right
reviewing-pr
chevron_right
packmind-standard-creator
chevron_right
packmind-standard-creator
chevron_right
code-review-router
chevron_right

Build your own?

Join 12,000+ developers contributing to the Claude ecosystem.