Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Key Features
- Comprehensive skill evaluation and performance tracking
- Community-driven ratings and reviews
- Easy integration with Claude Code
- Regular updates and maintenance
Quick Start
TopRank Skills install K-Dense-AI/peer-reviewchat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
Skill Details
GitHub Stars
8.6k
GitHub Forks
1k
Created
Jan 2026
Last Updated
4个月前
tools
tools academic
Related Skills
Build your own?
Join 12,000+ developers contributing to the Claude ecosystem.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!