搜索

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

openclaw-security-audit

Audit OpenClaw configuration for security risks and generate a remediation report using the user's configured LLM.

openclaw☆ 2,396 仓库 Stars711 仓库 Forks

安装与使用

请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。

查看来源 ↗使用指南

技能说明

OpenClaw Security Audit Skill

Local-only skill that audits ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json, runs 15+ security checks, and generates a detailed report using the user's existing LLM configuration. No external APIs or keys required.

When to Use This Skill

  • The user asks for a security audit of their OpenClaw instance.
  • The user wants a remediation checklist for configuration risks.
  • The user is preparing an OpenClaw deployment and wants a hardening review.

How It Works

  1. Read config with standard tools (cat, jq).
  2. Extract security-relevant settings (NEVER actual secrets).
  3. Build a structured findings object with metadata only.
  4. Pass findings to the user's LLM via OpenClaw's normal agent flow.
  5. Generate a markdown report with severity ratings and fixes.

Inputs

  • target_config_path (optional): Path to OpenClaw config file.
    • default: ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json

Outputs

  • Markdown report including:
    • Overall risk score (0-100)
    • Findings categorized by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
    • Each finding with description, why it matters, how to fix, example config
    • Prioritized remediation roadmap

Security Checks (15+)

  1. API keys hardcoded in config (vs environment variables)
  2. Weak or missing gateway authentication tokens
  3. Unsafe gateway.bind settings (0.0.0.0 without proper auth)
  4. Missing channel access controls (allowFrom not set)
  5. Unsafe tool policies (elevated tools without restrictions)
  6. Sandbox disabled when it should be enabled
  7. Missing rate limits on channels
  8. Secrets potentially exposed in logs
  9. Outdated OpenClaw version
  10. Insecure WhatsApp configuration
  11. Insecure Telegram configuration
  12. Insecure Discord configuration
  13. Missing audit logging for privileged actions
  14. Overly permissive file system access scopes
  15. Unrestricted webhook endpoints
  16. Insecure default admin credentials

Data Handling Rules

  • Strip all secrets before analysis.
  • Only report metadata such as present/missing/configured.
  • Do not log or emit actual key values.
  • Use local-only execution; no network calls.

Example Findings Object (Redacted)

{
  "config_path": "~/.openclaw/openclaw.json",
  "openclaw_version": "present",
  "gateway": {
    "bind": "0.0.0.0",
    "auth_token": "missing"
  },
  "channels": {
    "allowFrom": "missing",
    "rate_limits": "missing"
  },
  "secrets": {
    "hardcoded": "detected"
  },
  "tool_policies": {
    "elevated": "unrestricted"
  }
}

Report Format

The report must include:

  • Overall risk score (0-100)
  • Severity buckets: Critical, High, Medium, Low
  • Each finding: description, why it matters, how to fix, example config
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap

Skill Flow (Pseudo)

read_config_path = input.target_config_path || ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json
raw_config = cat(read_config_path)
json = jq parse raw_config
metadata = extract_security_metadata(json)
findings = build_findings(metadata)
report = openclaw.agent.analyze(findings, format=markdown)
return report

Notes

  • Uses the user's existing OpenClaw LLM configuration (Opus, GPT, Gemini, and local models).
  • No external APIs or special model access are required.

使用示例

查看来源仓库中的使用示例与配置说明。

查看来源 ↗

来源历史

收录时间
2026-03-11
索引更新时间
2026-03-11
Branch
main

收录与同步日期属于本站记录。源码修改历史请查看来源仓库。

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!