搜索

PythonReactSEOPDF
GitHub Skill

pragmatic-architecture

Prevents over-engineering by enforcing industry-proven principles: AHA (Avoid Hasty Abstractions), YAGNI, Colocation, and Rule of Three. Use when designing features, planning architecture, "architect this", "design the structure", or when the code-architect agent is dispatched. Triggers: file structure, module organization, abstraction decisions, component splitting.

pproenca☆ 0 仓库 Stars0 仓库 Forks

安装与使用

请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。

查看来源 ↗使用指南

技能说明

Pragmatic Architecture

Design for today's requirements. Let complexity grow incrementally as needed.

The Four Principles

1. Rule of Three (Don Roberts)

"The first time, just do it. The second time, wince at duplication but do it anyway. The third time, refactor."

Abstract on the 3rd occurrence, not before.

Occurrences Action
1 Implement directly
2 Duplicate, note similarity
3+ Now extract abstraction
2. AHA - Avoid Hasty Abstractions (Kent C. Dodds)

"Prefer duplication over the wrong abstraction." — Sandi Metz

Duplication is cheaper than the wrong abstraction. Wrong abstractions accumulate parameters and conditionals until unmaintainable.

Signs of wrong abstraction:

  • Adding parameters to handle "just one more case"
  • Conditional paths through shared code
  • Comments explaining which caller uses which path

Recovery: Inline the abstraction, re-duplicate, let the right pattern emerge.

3. YAGNI - You Ain't Gonna Need It (Ron Jeffries)

"Always implement things when you actually need them, never when you just foresee that you need them."

No hooks for future features. No "we might need this someday."

❌ Speculative ✅ Pragmatic
options?: ExtensionConfig unused Add when extension exists
Abstract factory for one impl Direct instantiation
Event system for single listener Direct call
Plugin architecture for no plugins Hardcoded behavior
4. Colocation (Kent C. Dodds)

"Place code as close to where it's relevant as possible."

Minimize file splitting. Keep related code together.

❌ Over-split ✅ Colocated
types/user.ts, utils/user.ts, constants/user.ts Single user.ts with all
Separate styles/, hooks/, utils/ folders Component folder with all related
10 files for one feature 1-3 files max per feature

Decision Framework

Before creating abstraction, ask:

1. Does this exist 3+ times? → No? Don't abstract
2. Are the use cases truly identical? → No? Don't abstract
3. Would someone unfamiliar understand this? → No? Simpler design
4. Am I solving today's problem? → No? YAGNI

File Organization Rules

Prefer:

  • Feature-based folders over type-based folders
  • Fewer, larger files over many tiny files
  • Colocated tests (foo.test.ts next to foo.ts)
  • Single source of truth per concept

Avoid:

  • types/, utils/, constants/, helpers/ folders that scatter related code
  • Files under 50 lines (usually should be merged)
  • More than 3 files per feature (unless genuinely complex)

Anti-Patterns to Block

Speculative Generality (Fowler)

"Oh, I think we'll need the ability to do this someday"

Symptoms: Abstract classes doing nothing, unused parameters, delegation that could be direct.

Block: Any "for future use" justification.

Shotgun Surgery (Fowler)

"One change requires modifications across many files"

Caused by over-splitting. Fix by consolidating related code.

Block: Designs requiring 5+ file changes for simple features.

Premature Abstraction

Creating BaseHandler, AbstractService, GenericRepository before concrete needs exist.

Block: Any abstract class without 2+ concrete implementations in the plan.

Output Requirements

When designing architecture:

  1. Justify every new file — Why can't this live in an existing file?
  2. Justify every abstraction — Where are the 3 concrete uses?
  3. Prefer boring — Standard patterns over clever solutions
  4. Count the files — If feature needs 5+ files, reconsider

References

For detailed patterns and examples:

  • references/file-organization.md — Colocated vs scattered patterns
  • references/abstraction-examples.md — Good vs bad abstraction decisions

使用示例

查看来源仓库中的使用示例与配置说明。

查看来源 ↗

来源历史

收录时间
2026-01-20
索引更新时间
2026-01-26
Branch
main

收录与同步日期属于本站记录。源码修改历史请查看来源仓库。

GitHub ↗

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!