tdd-mastery | Skill Performance & Reviews | TopRankSkills

TopRank Skills

Home / Skills / development / tdd-mastery

tdd-mastery

maintained by rohitg00

star 662 account_tree 115 verified_user MIT License
bolt View GitHub

name: tdd-mastery description: Test-driven development workflow with Red-Green-Refactor cycle across languages

TDD Mastery

Core Cycle: Red-Green-Refactor

  1. Red - Write a failing test that defines the desired behavior
  2. Green - Write the minimum code to make the test pass
  3. Refactor - Clean up while keeping tests green

Never write production code without a failing test first. Each cycle should take 2-10 minutes.

Test Structure

Use the Arrange-Act-Assert pattern consistently:

Arrange: Set up test data and dependencies
Act:     Execute the behavior under test
Assert:  Verify the expected outcome

Name tests as test_<unit>_<scenario>_<expected_result> or it("should <behavior> when <condition>").

Jest / Vitest Patterns

describe("OrderService", () => {
  it("should apply discount when order exceeds threshold", () => {
    const order = createOrder({ items: [{ price: 150, qty: 1 }] });
    const result = applyDiscount(order, { threshold: 100, percent: 10 });
    expect(result.total).toBe(135);
  });

  it("should throw when applying discount to empty order", () => {
    const order = createOrder({ items: [] });
    expect(() => applyDiscount(order, defaultDiscount)).toThrow(EmptyOrderError);
  });
});

Use vi.fn() / jest.fn() for mocks. Prefer dependency injection over module mocking. Use beforeEach for shared setup, never share mutable state between tests.

pytest Patterns

@pytest.fixture
def db_session():
    session = create_test_session()
    yield session
    session.rollback()

def test_create_user_stores_hashed_password(db_session):
    user = UserService(db_session).create(email="a@b.com", password="secret")
    assert user.password_hash != "secret"
    assert verify_password("secret", user.password_hash)

@pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [
    ("", False),
    ("short", False),
    ("ValidPass1!", True),
])
def test_password_validation(input, expected):
    assert validate_password(input) == expected

Use pytest.raises for exceptions. Use conftest.py for shared fixtures. Mark slow tests with @pytest.mark.slow.

Go Testing Patterns

func TestParseConfig(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name    string
        input   string
        want    Config
        wantErr bool
    }{
        {"valid yaml", "port: 8080", Config{Port: 8080}, false},
        {"empty input", "", Config{}, true},
        {"invalid port", "port: -1", Config{}, true},
    }
    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got, err := ParseConfig([]byte(tt.input))
            if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr {
                t.Errorf("ParseConfig() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr)
                return
            }
            if !tt.wantErr && got != tt.want {
                t.Errorf("ParseConfig() = %v, want %v", got, tt.want)
            }
        })
    }
}

Use table-driven tests by default. Use t.Helper() in test utility functions. Use testify/assert only if the team already uses it.

Test Levels

Level Scope Speed Dependencies
Unit Single function/class <100ms None (mock all)
Integration Module boundaries <5s Real DB, real FS
E2E Full user flow <30s Full stack

Ratio target: 70% unit, 20% integration, 10% e2e.

Coverage Rules

  • Enforce 80% line coverage minimum in CI
  • Track branch coverage, not just line coverage
  • Exclude generated code, type definitions, and config files
  • Never write tests just to hit coverage numbers; test behavior
# Jest/Vitest
vitest run --coverage --coverage.thresholds.lines=80 --coverage.thresholds.branches=75

# pytest
pytest --cov=src --cov-fail-under=80 --cov-branch

# Go
go test -coverprofile=cover.out -coverpkg=./... ./...
go tool cover -func=cover.out

Mocking Guidelines

  • Mock at boundaries: HTTP clients, databases, file systems, clocks
  • Never mock the unit under test
  • Prefer fakes (in-memory implementations) over mocks for repositories
  • Assert on behavior, not on mock call counts
  • Use t.Cleanup / afterEach to reset shared mocks

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Testing implementation details instead of behavior
  • Tests that pass when code is deleted (tautological tests)
  • Shared mutable state between test cases
  • Ignoring flaky tests instead of fixing them
  • Testing private methods directly
  • Giant test setup that obscures intent

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Skill Details

GitHub Stars 662
GitHub Forks 115
Created Mar 2026
Last Updated 4个月前
development development architecture patterns

Related Skills

dagger-design-proposals
chevron_right
nestjs-expert
chevron_right
docker-expert
chevron_right
kafka-streams-topology
chevron_right
kafka-architecture
chevron_right

Build your own?

Join 12,000+ developers contributing to the Claude ecosystem.