blueprints-organization | Skill Performance & Reviews | TopRankSkills

TopRank Skills

Home / Skills / tools / blueprints-organization

blueprints-organization

maintained by TheBushidoCollective

star 75 account_tree 10 verified_user MIT License
bolt View GitHub

name: blueprints-organization description: Use when managing blueprints directory structure and avoiding duplication. Always search_blueprints before creating to prevent duplicate documentation. Handles naming conventions and cross-references. allowed-tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, mcp__plugin_hashi-blueprints_blueprints__search_blueprints, mcp__plugin_hashi-blueprints_blueprints__read_blueprint, mcp__plugin_hashi-blueprints_blueprints__write_blueprint]

Organizing Technical Blueprints

Directory Structure

blueprints/
├── README.md              # Index and overview
├── {system-name}.md       # One file per system
├── {feature-name}.md      # One file per feature
└── {integration-name}.md  # One file per integration

Flat vs Nested

Prefer flat structure for most projects:

  • Easier to navigate
  • Simpler cross-references
  • Less organizational overhead

Use subdirectories only for very large projects:

blueprints/
├── README.md
├── core/
│   ├── README.md
│   └── *.md
├── features/
│   └── *.md
└── integrations/
    └── *.md

Naming Conventions

File Names

  • Use kebab-case: user-authentication.md
  • Match system/feature names in code
  • Be specific: api-rate-limiting.md not api.md
  • Avoid generic names: utils.md, helpers.md

Good Names

  • mcp-server.md - Specific system
  • settings-merge.md - Specific feature
  • github-integration.md - Specific integration

Bad Names

  • overview.md - Too generic (use README.md)
  • misc.md - Catch-all is a smell
  • new-feature.md - Not descriptive

The blueprints/README.md Index

Every blueprints/ directory needs an index:

# Technical Blueprints

Implementation documentation for {Project Name}.

## Overview

Brief description of what this project does and how blueprints are organized.

## Systems

Core systems and their documentation:

### Core

- [Settings Management](./settings-management.md) - How configuration is loaded and merged
- [Plugin System](./plugin-system.md) - Plugin discovery and loading

### Features

- [MCP Server](./mcp-server.md) - Model Context Protocol implementation
- [Hook Dispatch](./hook-dispatch.md) - How hooks are executed

### Integrations

- [GitHub Integration](./github-integration.md) - GitHub API integration

## Contributing

When adding new blueprints:
1. Check for existing related documentation
2. Use consistent naming and structure
3. Update this index

Avoiding Duplication

The Duplication Problem

Duplicate documentation:

  • Gets out of sync
  • Confuses readers
  • Wastes maintenance effort

Prevention Strategies

  1. Search before creating using MCP tools

    // Search for existing blueprints
    const results = await search_blueprints({ keyword: "auth" });
    // Returns: [{ name: "authentication", summary: "..." }]
    
    // Read existing blueprint to check coverage
    const blueprint = await read_blueprint({ name: "authentication" });
    
  2. One source of truth

    • Each concept documented once
    • Other locations link to the source
  3. Merge related topics

    • Combine tightly coupled systems
    • Split only when truly independent
  4. Cross-reference liberally

    For authentication details, see [User Authentication](./user-authentication.md).
    

When to Split vs Merge

Keep together when:

  • Systems are tightly coupled
  • Understanding one requires understanding the other
  • They share significant context

Split apart when:

  • Systems can be understood independently
  • Different audiences need different docs
  • File would exceed ~500 lines

Handling Overlap

When systems overlap:

Option 1: Primary Location + References

Document in one place, reference from others:

# System A

## Authentication

This system uses shared authentication. See [Authentication](./authentication.md) for details.

Option 2: Shared Section

Create a shared blueprint that both reference:

# System A
Uses [Shared Auth](./shared-auth.md)

# System B
Uses [Shared Auth](./shared-auth.md)

# Shared Auth
Details here...

Option 3: Inline with Scope

Document the overlap in each, scoped to that system:

# System A

## Authentication (System A Specific)

How System A specifically uses authentication...

Deprecation

When systems are removed:

  1. Delete the blueprint file - Don't keep "for history"
  2. Update the index - Remove from README.md
  3. Fix broken links - Update any references
  4. Git history - Use version control for history

Auditing Organization

Periodically check:

  • All blueprint files in index?
  • All index entries have files?
  • No obvious duplicates?
  • Names match code terminology?
  • Cross-references work?
  • No orphaned files?

Tools

Find Orphaned Blueprints

# Files not in README.md
for f in blueprints/*.md; do
  grep -q "$(basename $f)" blueprints/README.md || echo "Orphan: $f"
done

Find Duplicate Topics

# Similar file names
ls blueprints/*.md | xargs -n1 basename | sort | uniq -d

# Similar content
grep -l "specific term" blueprints/*.md

chat Comments (0)

chat_bubble_outline

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Skill Details

GitHub Stars 75
GitHub Forks 10
Created Jan 2026
Last Updated 4个月前
tools tools automation tools

Related Skills

specs-gen
chevron_right
glm-coding-agent
chevron_right
feature-dev
chevron_right
creating-pr
chevron_right
reviewing-pr
chevron_right

Build your own?

Join 12,000+ developers contributing to the Claude ecosystem.