api
API design and developer experience for TypeScript libraries. Use when designing APIs, reviewing architecture, evaluating DX, or checking ergonomics. Covers extensibility, progressive disclosure, type inference, state patterns, and composition. For review, load review/workflow.md. Triggers: "design API", "review API", "check DX", "is this ergonomic", "review architecture", "middleware design", "how does this feel".
安装与使用
请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。
查看来源 ↗使用指南技能说明
API Design & Developer Experience
Principles for designing TypeScript library APIs and evaluating developer experience.
Goal: APIs should feel obvious, fast, safe, and composable — with great defaults and great escape hatches.
Quick Reference
Foundational
- Emergent extensibility — Best extension points look like well-designed APIs, not plugin systems
-
Composition over configuration —
devtools(persist(fn))beats{ middlewares: [] } - Onion model — Transformative middleware innermost, observational outermost
API Surface
- Config objects for 3+ parameters (no overloads)
- Flat returns for independent values, namespaced for cohesive units
- Rule of two — Tuples for 2 values, objects for 3+
- Inference over annotation — If users annotate, types aren't flowing
Progressive Disclosure
- Complexity grows with use case — Zero-config → Options → Composition → Headless → Core
- Escape hatches compose — Don't require reimplementing defaults
- Explicit contracts — Render props over implicit requirements
Developer Experience
- Time-to-first-success — Minimize time from install to working code
- Cognitive load — Fewer concepts > fewer keystrokes
- Predictable outcomes — Match user mental models
- Editor ergonomics — TypeScript inference should just work
Conflict Resolution
When principles conflict, prioritize:
- Correctness — wrong behavior > verbose API
- Type Safety — inference failures > extra generics
- Simplicity — fewer concepts > fewer keystrokes
- Consistency — match existing codebase patterns
- Bundle Size — tree-shaking matters, but not at DX cost
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails |
|---|---|
| Function overloads | Poor errors, autocomplete confusion |
| Runtime plugin registration | Loses type safety, implicit ordering |
| Positional parameters (3+) | Order confusion, breaking changes |
| Implicit contracts | Silent breakage when requirements unmet |
| Per-module middleware | Unexpected interactions |
| Shotgun parsing | Validation scattered, not at boundaries |
| Boolean traps | fn(true, false) — what do these mean? |
| Multiple competing APIs | Confusing — which method to use? |
Reference Files
| File | Contents |
|---|---|
| references/principles.md | Core design and DX principles |
| references/typescript.md | Type inference patterns (author + consumer) |
| references/state.md | State management patterns and architecture |
| references/extensibility.md | Pipelines, builders, adapters, lifecycles |
| references/anti-patterns.md | Common mistakes to avoid |
| references/libraries.md | Reference libraries and their patterns |
| references/voices.md | Practitioner heuristics and reference URLs |
Loading by Domain
| Domain | Load |
|---|---|
| General API work | principles.md |
| TypeScript/types | typescript.md |
| State management | state.md |
| Middleware/plugins | extensibility.md |
| Avoiding mistakes | anti-patterns.md |
| Library comparisons | libraries.md, voices.md |
Review
For reviewing APIs and architecture, load review/workflow.md.
| File | Contents |
|---|---|
| review/workflow.md | Review process and checklists |
| review/agents.md | Sub-agent prompts |
| review/templates.md | Issue format, report template |
| review/checklist.md | Quick single-agent checklist |
| review/example.md | Complete example review |
Related Skills
| Need | Use |
|---|---|
| Building UI components | component skill |
| Accessibility patterns | aria skill |
| Documentation | docs skill |
使用示例
查看来源仓库中的使用示例与配置说明。
查看来源 ↗来源历史
- 收录时间
- 2026-01-20
- 索引更新时间
- 2026-01-28
- Branch
- main
收录与同步日期属于本站记录。源码修改历史请查看来源仓库。
GitHub ↗chat Comments (0)
Sign in to join the discussion and leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!