Skills correspondant au nom, à la description ou à l’auteur GitHub.
Reviews code for quality, security, performance, and accessibility issues. Use when user mentions reviews, code review, security, performance, quality checks, PRs, diffs, or change review. Do NOT load for: impl...
detailed development workflow with modular patterns for git, code review, testing, documentation, and deployment
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review stand...
Code review checkpoint using codex review CLI. Returns structured result with pass/fail status and issues. Use when: 'code review', 'review changes', 'codex review', 'check my code'.
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Fe...
Use when conducting comprehensive code review for pull requests across multiple quality dimensions. Orchestrates 12-15 specialized reviewer agents across 4 phases using star topology coordination. Covers automa...
Follow consistent project structure, version control practices, environment configuration, code review processes, and development conventions across the entire application. Use this skill when organizing projec...
Deep code review with web research to verify against latest ecosystem. Use when user says 'double check against latest', 'verify versions', 'check security', 'review against docs', or needs deep analysis beyond...
Systematic code review workflow using zen mcp's codex tool. Use this skill when the user explicitly requests "use codex to check the code", "check if the recently generated code has any issues", or "check the c...
Comprehensive PR review with 6-7 parallel specialized agents. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking PRs, code review.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or st...
Use when completing tasks, code reviews, or deployments to verify work with evidence. Collects test results, build outputs, coverage metrics, and exit codes to prove work is complete.
Gate 4 of development cycle - dispatches 5 specialized reviewers (code, business-logic, security, test, nil-safety) in parallel for comprehensive code review feedback.
Autonomous plan execution - fresh subagent per task with automated code review between tasks. No human-in-loop, high throughput with quality gates.
Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, or providing...
Automated code review and security linting integration for CI/CD pipelines using reviewdog. Aggregates findings from multiple security and quality tools (SAST, linters, formatters) into unified code review comm...
This skill should be used when the user asks to "execute task", "implement feature", "delegate work", "run workflow", "review code", "code quality check", or needs task orchestration and code review guidance. P...
Use this skill for code review, testing, refactoring, and optimization. Activates for security review, test generation, performance analysis, and code cleanup tasks.
22 production-ready AI agents with database-driven orchestration for security reviews, code quality analysis, deployment validation, infrastructure checks, and compliance. Auto-activates for security concerns,...
Comprehensive development workflow specialist combining TDD, debugging, performance optimization, code review, PR review, and quality assurance into unified development workflows
Google Gemini CLI for second opinions, architectural advice, code reviews, security audits. Leverage 1M+ context for comprehensive codebase analysis via command-line tool.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates
Systematic multi-perspective code review with consistent quality gates.
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.