code-review-workflow
Complete code review workflow for PR/MR with multiple reviewers and automated checks. Triggers: PRW, 審查流程, review workflow, PR review, MR review, pull request, merge request, 程式碼審查流程, full review, 完...
Skills correspondant au nom, à la description ou à l’auteur GitHub.
Complete code review workflow for PR/MR with multiple reviewers and automated checks. Triggers: PRW, 審查流程, review workflow, PR review, MR review, pull request, merge request, 程式碼審查流程, full review, 完...
Expert code reviewer that enforces best practices, clean code principles, strong typing (TypeScript), architecture guidelines, and security standards. Reviews PRs and code snippets for bugs, code smells, anti-p...
Create AI-assisted code reviews on GitHub, GitLab, or Forgejo. Use when asked to review a PR/MR, analyze code changes, or provide review feedback.
Technical code review (architecture, type safety, patterns). Use for pre-merge review or general code quality audit.
Use when receiving code review feedback, processing PR comments, or needing to evaluate suggestions before implementing - requires technical verification not blind agreement
Code review workflow for evaluating changes against standards. Use when reviewing pull requests, commits, or diffs.
Performs strict code review with comprehensive validation
Code review and audit agent for pull requests and code quality
Reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use after writing/modifying code, before commits, or when asked to review changes. Triggers on "review code", "check my changes", "code review".
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code with codex", "run codex review", "check code quality", "codex レビュー", mentions "レビューゲート", or before git commit/PR/merge/release. Performs i...
Technical evaluation of code review feedback. Use when receiving review feedback - requires verification before implementing, no performative agreement, push back when technically wrong.
Generates a code review checklist for the Code Reviewer agent
Use for security, quality, and PM compliance review before merging strategy code. Supports Ralph Loop iterative mode for backtest optimization. Runs PM audit, security audit, code review, backtest validation, a...
Systematic code review for TapScore focusing on code smells, duplication, architecture violations, and security issues. Use when reviewing code changes before commit or merge. Provides constructive feedback wit...
Critical code review methodology. Use when reviewing code, PRs, or changes to enforce rigorous review standards.
Python code review specialist. Use when reviewing Python code, checking for bugs, security issues, or ensuring code quality standards.
Copilot agent that assists with comprehensive code review focusing on code quality, SOLID principles, security, performance, and best practices Trigger terms: code review, review code, code quality, best pract...
Expert code reviewer for Python, TypeScript, and general best practices
Automated code review for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, quality analysis, or wants feedback on their code.
Perform code review with DDD architecture compliance check. Triggers: review, 程式碼審查, code review, 審查, CR.
Systematic code review checklist for quality, correctness, and maintainability
Automated AI-powered code review that runs on git hooks with progressive disclosure design. Use when setting up automated code review for a project, installing git hooks for code review, creating or modifying r...
Use immediately when user mentions: "code review", "コードレビュー", "レビュー", "review", "品質", "quality", "チェック", "check", "lint", "format", "test", "type check", "pyright", "ruff", "pytest", "テスト",...
Comprehensive code review for quality, architecture, and performance. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing code quality, checking coding standards, evaluating design patterns, identifying performance bottlenecks, o...
Le classement utilise les étoiles du dépôt GitHub indexé. Plusieurs skills peuvent partager ce nombre : ce n’est ni un nombre d’installations ni une note de qualité.