Search

PythonReactSEOPDF
OpenClaw

agent-team-orchestration

Orchestrate multi-agent teams with defined roles, task lifecycles, handoff protocols, and review workflows. Use when: (1) Setting up a team of 2+ agents with different specializations, (2) Defining task routing and lifecycle (inbox → spec → build → review → done), (3) Creating handoff protocols between agents, (4) Establishing review and quality gates, (5) Managing async communication and artifact sharing between agents.

arminnaimi0 source installs☆ 0 Repository stars

Installation

Follow the repository instructions for this skill and your agent. Review the files and dependencies before adding it to your workflow.

SkillHub CLI

skillhub install arminnaimi/agent-team-orchestration

Inspect the source and compatibility requirements, then follow its installation steps.

Give your agent the source link and ask it to inspect instructions and dependencies before explaining the installation steps.

View source ↗Guides

Skill instructions

Agent Team Orchestration

Production playbook for running multi-agent teams with clear roles, structured task flow, and quality gates.

Quick Start: Minimal 2-Agent Team

A builder and a reviewer. The simplest useful team.

1. Define Roles
Orchestrator (you) — Route tasks, track state, report results
Builder agent     — Execute work, produce artifacts
2. Spawn a Task
1. Create task record (file, DB, or task board)
2. Spawn builder with:
   - Task ID and description
   - Output path for artifacts
   - Handoff instructions (what to produce, where to put it)
3. On completion: review artifacts, mark done, report
3. Add a Reviewer
Builder produces artifact → Reviewer checks it → Orchestrator ships or returns

That's the core loop. Everything below scales this pattern.

Core Concepts

Roles

Every agent has one primary role. Overlap causes confusion.

Role Purpose Model guidance
Orchestrator Route work, track state, make priority calls High-reasoning model (handles judgment)
Builder Produce artifacts — code, docs, configs Can use cost-effective models for mechanical work
Reviewer Verify quality, push back on gaps High-reasoning model (catches what builders miss)
Ops Cron jobs, standups, health checks, dispatching Cheapest model that's reliable

→ Read references/team-setup.md when defining a new team or adding agents.

Task States

Every task moves through a defined lifecycle:

Inbox → Assigned → In Progress → Review → Done | Failed

Rules:

  • Orchestrator owns state transitions — don't rely on agents to update their own status
  • Every transition gets a comment (who, what, why)
  • Failed is a valid end state — capture why and move on

→ Read references/task-lifecycle.md when designing task flows or debugging stuck tasks.

Handoffs

When work passes b...

Source information

Source
github
Repository
openclaw/skills
Path
skills/arminnaimi/agent-team-orchestration
Version
—
Commit
7d382776c9ae67d4df508a122a9de6646188f187
Classification source
rules
Status
active
Visibility
public

These signals come from indexed source analysis and may lag behind changes. Check the current source files.

Extracted content

SKILL.md
# Agent Team Orchestration

Production playbook for running multi-agent teams with clear roles, structured task flow, and quality gates.

## Quick Start: Minimal 2-Agent Team

A builder and a reviewer. The simplest useful team.

### 1. Define Roles

```
Orchestrator (you) — Route tasks, track state, report results
Builder agent     — Execute work, produce artifacts
```

### 2. Spawn a Task

```
1. Create task record (file, DB, or task board)
2. Spawn builder with:
   - Task ID and description
   - Output path for artifacts
   - Handoff instructions (what to produce, where to put it)
3. On completion: review artifacts, mark done, report
```

### 3. Add a Reviewer

```
Builder produces artifact → Reviewer checks it → Orchestrator ships or returns
```

That's the core loop. Everything below scales this pattern.

## Core Concepts

### Roles

Every agent has one primary role. Overlap causes confusion.

| Role | Purpose | Model guidance |
|------|---------|---------------|
| **Orchestrator** | Route work, track state, make priority calls | High-reasoning model (handles judgment) |
| **Builder** | Produce artifacts — code, docs, configs | Can use cost-effective models for mechanical work |
| **Reviewer** | Verify quality, push back on gaps | High-reasoning model (catches what builders miss) |
| **Ops** | Cron jobs, standups, health checks, dispatching | Cheapest model that's reliable |

→ *Read [references/team-setup.md](references/team-setup.md) when defining a new team or adding agents.*

### Task States

Every task moves through a defined lifecycle:

```
Inbox → Assigned → In Progress → Review → Done | Failed
```

**Rules:**
- Orchestrator owns state transitions — don't rely on agents to update their own status
- Every transition gets a comment (who, what, why)
- Failed is a valid end state — capture why and move on

→ *Read [references/task-lifecycle.md](references/task-lifecycle.md) when designing task flows or debugging stuck tasks.*

### Handoffs

When work passes b...

Related skills

OpenClaw

dojo.md

edholofy

University for AI agents. 92 courses, 4400+ scenarios, any model via OpenRouter. Auto-training loops generate per-model SKILL.md documents. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Cursor, Windsurf. No fine-tuning req...

OpenClaw

wps-macos-helper

lethehades

macOS WPS Office workflow helper skill for safer document preparation, conversion, export, and compatibility guidance