dojo.md
University for AI agents. 92 courses, 4400+ scenarios, any model via OpenRouter. Auto-training loops generate per-model SKILL.md documents. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Cursor, Windsurf. No fine-tuning req...
Read prose sequentially with structured reflections to simulate the reading experience
请根据来源仓库和你的 AI 工具说明安装此技能。先阅读技能文件和依赖要求,再添加到工作流。
SkillHub CLI
skillhub install horace-claw/sequential-read打开来源仓库,查看说明和兼容环境后,按来源提供的命令或步骤安装。
将来源链接提供给你的 Agent,让它先读取说明、核对依赖,并向你说明将执行的安装步骤。
Read prose (novels, non-fiction, articles) by ingesting content in semantic chunks and building structured reflections iteratively. The output captures how your perspective developed over the course of reading — predictions that were wrong, questions that got answered, opinions that shifted — not just a retroactive summary.
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
/sequential-read <path-to-file> |
Run a full reading session |
/sequential-read <path-to-file> --lens <persona> |
Read with a perspective (e.g., "skeptic", "literary critic", "student") |
/sequential-read list |
List all sessions |
/sequential-read show <session-id> |
Show the synthesis for a completed session |
The pipeline runs in spawned sub-agents. Novel-length reads are a two-phase process: a main reader that handles the bulk of chunks, then a finisher that completes the remaining chunks and writes synthesis. This is the normal flow, not an error.
When the user invokes /sequential-read:
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/session_manager.py create <source-file>
sessions_spawn with label: reader-{session-id}
Tell the agent: "Session already exists at {session-id}. Do NOT create it again."
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/session_manager.py get <session-id>
For...
这些信息来自收录时的来源分析,可能滞后;使用前请核对最新来源文件。
Read prose (novels, essays, articles) chunk by chunk with structured reflections that capture how your understanding develops over the course of reading — not just a retroactive summary.
Instead of dumping an entire book into context and asking "what did you think?", this skill:
The output captures what a retroactive summary cannot: predictions that were wrong, questions that got answered chapters later, opinions that shifted, moments of genuine surprise.
An AI reading a book all at once produces a book report. An AI reading sequentially produces something closer to a reading experience — the difference between knowing the destination and having walked the road.
Tested on 41+ novels with consistent results. The reading reflections surface genuine engagement: confusion, delight, boredom, revised opinions. The sequential constraint forces honesty.
sessions_spawn capability/sequential-read ~/books/my-book.txt
The skill handles everything autonomously — preread, chunking, sequential reading, synthesis. You'll be notified when it's done.
Source Text → Preread (chunk) → Read (reflect on each chunk) → Synthesize
For novels (20+ chunks), the pipeline automatically uses a two-phase reading pattern: a main reader handles ~80% of chunks, then a finisher completes the rest and writes the synthesis. This is normal operation, not error recovery.
Each session produces:
# 📖 Sequential Read
Read prose (novels, non-fiction, articles) by ingesting content in semantic chunks and building structured reflections iteratively. The output captures how your perspective developed over the course of reading — predictions that were wrong, questions that got answered, opinions that shifted — not just a retroactive summary.
## Invocation
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
| `/sequential-read <path-to-file>` | Run a full reading session |
| `/sequential-read <path-to-file> --lens <persona>` | Read with a perspective (e.g., "skeptic", "literary critic", "student") |
| `/sequential-read list` | List all sessions |
| `/sequential-read show <session-id>` | Show the synthesis for a completed session |
## Execution Model
**The pipeline runs in spawned sub-agents.** Novel-length reads are a two-phase process: a main reader that handles the bulk of chunks, then a finisher that completes the remaining chunks and writes synthesis. This is the normal flow, not an error.
When the user invokes `/sequential-read`:
1. Parse the command to extract the file path and optional lens
2. Pre-create the session:
```bash
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/session_manager.py create <source-file>
```
3. Spawn the **main reader** sub-agent:
```
sessions_spawn with label: reader-{session-id}
Tell the agent: "Session already exists at {session-id}. Do NOT create it again."
```
4. Tell the user the session has started and they'll be notified when it's done
5. **When the main reader returns** (whether it completed or died mid-read):
- Check session status: `python3 {baseDir}/scripts/session_manager.py get <session-id>`
- Check how many reflections exist vs total chunks
- **If synthesis exists:** Done. Present results.
- **If chunks remain or synthesis is missing:** Spawn a **finisher** sub-agent (see below). This is the expected path for novels.
6. When the finisher returns, present the synthesis and session path.
### The Two-Phase Pattern
For...# Sequential Read Read prose (novels, essays, articles) chunk by chunk with structured reflections that capture how your understanding develops over the course of reading — not just a retroactive summary. ## What It Does Instead of dumping an entire book into context and asking "what did you think?", this skill: 1. **Prereads** the source text and splits it into semantic chunks (~550 lines each, respecting chapter/section boundaries) 2. **Reads** each chunk sequentially, writing a structured reflection after each one — predictions, reactions, revised understanding, questions 3. **Synthesizes** the full reading experience into a final document that preserves the arc of discovery The output captures what a retroactive summary cannot: predictions that were wrong, questions that got answered chapters later, opinions that shifted, moments of genuine surprise. ## Why It Matters An AI reading a book all at once produces a book report. An AI reading sequentially produces something closer to a reading experience — the difference between knowing the destination and having walked the road. Tested on 41+ novels with consistent results. The reading reflections surface genuine engagement: confusion, delight, boredom, revised opinions. The sequential constraint forces honesty. ## Requirements - OpenClaw with `sessions_spawn` capability - Python 3 - A plain text file (.txt) of the work to read ## Quick Start ``` /sequential-read ~/books/my-book.txt ``` The skill handles everything autonomously — preread, chunking, sequential reading, synthesis. You'll be notified when it's done. ## Pipeline ``` Source Text → Preread (chunk) → Read (reflect on each chunk) → Synthesize ``` For novels (20+ chunks), the pipeline automatically uses a two-phase reading pattern: a main reader handles ~80% of chunks, then a finisher completes the rest and writes the synthesis. This is normal operation, not error recovery. ## Output Each session produces: - Individual chunk reflections in...
University for AI agents. 92 courses, 4400+ scenarios, any model via OpenRouter. Auto-training loops generate per-model SKILL.md documents. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Cursor, Windsurf. No fine-tuning req...
OpenClaw Skill for stock data analysis
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for AI search visibility. Optimize content to appear in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. Use when optimizing websites, pages, or content for LLM discove...
macOS WPS Office workflow helper skill for safer document preparation, conversion, export, and compatibility guidance